Court filing
Amended Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Derges (Dkt. 192, W.D. Mo.)
Summary
An amended preliminary order of forfeiture by United States District Judge Brian C. Wimes in United States v. Patricia Ashton Derges, No. 21-03016-01-CR-S-BCW, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division, filed September 27, 2022 as Document 192. On the government's motion, and based on the guilty verdict and the jury's determination that the property is subject to forfeiture under Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461, it orders forfeiture of property including approximately $287,565.33 seized from a Great Southern Bank account in the name of Ozark Valley Medical Clinic LLC. It provides for notice of the forfeiture. A later final order of forfeiture is to address all interests.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed September 27, 2022 in Patricia Ashton Derges; one of 6 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-09-27 |
Cite this document
“Amended Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Derges (Dkt. 192, W.D. Mo.).”
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, No. 6:21-cr-03016, Doc. 192, filed 2022-09-27. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-patricia-ashton-derges-mowd-155983/2022-09-27-gov-uscourts-mowd-155983-192-0-doc-192/
, SHA-256 890eabd3504d7cdd8cedc3f832bbcde15db1fac0d165555b038c3b9fe93e5cdb.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 21-03016-01-CR-S-BCW
v.
PATRICIA ASHTON DERGES,
Defendant.
AMENDED PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE
This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the United States for an Amended
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture.
In the Forfeiture Allegation of the Superseding Indictment in this case, the United States
sought forfeiture of all property, real and personal, constituting and derived from any proceeds
the defendant obtained directly and indirectly as a result of the offenses alleged in Counts One
through Eight and Twenty-One through Twenty-Three, including but not limited to a personal
money judgment against the defendant, Patricia Ashton Derges pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28 United States Code Section 2461. (D.E. 18.)
On April 13, 2021, an Amended Notice and Bill of Particulars for Forfeiture of Property
was filed by the United States giving notice that it is seeking forfeiture of the following property:
approximately $287,565.33 in United States currency seized from a Great Southern Bank Account,
ending in 4503, in the name of Ozark Valley Medical Clinic LLC, on or about March 24, 2021, an
account controlled by Patricia Ashton Derges as proceeds directly traceable to the violations
alleged in Counts One through Eight and Twenty-One through Twenty-Three of the Superseding
Indictment. (D.E. 27.)
Case 6:21-cr-03016-BCW Document 192 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 4
On June 28, 2022, a jury found the defendant, Patricia Ashton Derges, guilty of, inter alia,
Count One through Seven and Twenty-One through Twenty-Three of the Superseding Indictment.
The jury also determined that the United States established the requisite nexus between the above-
described property and the offenses committed by the defendant. (D.E. 182.)
The Court has determined, based upon the evidence set forth in the jury's special verdict
the United States has established the requisite nexus between the property described herein and
in the Forfeiture Allegation of the Superseding Indictment and the offenses of which the
defendant has been found guilty.
By virtue of the guilty verdict and the evidence admitted at trial, the United States has
likewise established the requisite nexus for a money judgment against the defendant.
Accordingly, the United States is now entitled to a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and to
possession of the property pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and
Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. Based upon the guilty verdict and the jury=s determination that the property is
subject to forfeiture and the Forfeiture Allegation in the Superseding Indictment, the above-
described property is hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition in accordance with the
law, subject to the provisions of Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n). (third party
provisions).
2. Furthermore, the defendant Patricia Ashton Derges shall pay to the United States
a personal money judgment to be determined by the Court at sentencing.
Case 6:21-cr-03016-BCW Document 192 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 4
3. Upon entry of this Order, the United States Attorney General or his designee is
authorized to seize the above-described property in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3).
4. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, the United States shall
publish for at least 30 consecutive days on the government=s official website,
www.forfeiture.gov, notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, notice of the United States=
intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct, and notice
that any person, other than the defendant Patricia Ashton Derges, having or claiming a legal
interest in the above-described property must file a petition with the Court (and serve a copy on
Shannon T. Kempf, Assistant United States Attorney), within thirty (30) days of the final
publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, whichever is earlier.
This notice shall state that the petition shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of
the petitioner's alleged interest in the property, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of
perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title or interest in the
forfeited property and any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim and the relief sought.
The United States may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any
person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of this Preliminary
Order of Forfeiture, as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified.
5. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4), this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall
become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing (or before if the defendant consents)
and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment.
6. The United States may conduct any discovery it considers necessary to identify,
locate, or dispose of the property subject to forfeiture or substitute assets for such property.
Case 6:21-cr-03016-BCW Document 192 Filed 09/27/22 Page 3 of 4
7. Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a Final Order
of Forfeiture in which all interests will be addressed.
SO ORDERED:
Dated: September 27, 2022
/s/ Brian C. Wimes
BRIAN C. WIMES
United States District Judge
Case 6:21-cr-03016-BCW Document 192 Filed 09/27/22 Page 4 of 4File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mowd.155983.192.0.pdf
- Size
- 114,307 bytes
- SHA-256
- 890eabd3504d7cdd8cedc3f832bbcde15db1fac0d165555b038c3b9fe93e5cdb
- Original
- archive.org