Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Full Docket Oto Benworth Prd 175040 Exhibit 7 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC (Dkt. 182.8)

Court filing

Exhibit 7 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC (Dkt. 182.8)

No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM · Doc. 182-8 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

Exhibit 7, Doc. 182-8, filed December 6, 2024 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC, No. 3:23-cv-01034-GMM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. It is Oto Analytics, LLC's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Bernardo Navarro, dated July 19, 2024, seeking documents by August 19, 2024. Its definitions describe a 2021 Transfer of approximately $171 million from Benworth FL to Benworth PR and dividend payments to Bernardo Navarro of at least $48,240,502.75. The 17 requests cover the loan servicing agreements, the 2021 Transfer, payments from either Benworth company to Mr. Navarro or entities he controls, the formation of Benworth PR, the solvency of Benworth FL, and communications with the SBA, Congress or the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. The 11-page exhibit is signed by Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM   Document 182-8   Filed 12/06/24   Page 1 of 11




              EXHIBIT 7
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM              Document 182-8       Filed 12/06/24     Page 2 of 11




                           IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

 OTO ANALYTICS, LLC,                                §
                                                    §
                      Plaintiff,                    §
                                                    §
                          v.                        §   Civil Action No. 23-01034
                                                    §
 BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS PR                       §
 LLC, BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS                     §
 LLC, BERNARDO NAVARRO and                          §
 CLAUDIA NAVARRO,                                   §
                                                    §
                      Defendants.

        PLAINTIFF OTO ANALYTICS, LLC’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
             PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT BERNARDO NAVARRO

       Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Federal Rules”),

Plaintiff Oto Analytics, LLC (f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc. d/b/a Womply) (“Womply”) hereby

requests that, by August 19, 2024, Defendant Bernardo Navarro produce for inspection and

copying the documents and other tangible things described below (the “Requests”) at the offices

of McConnell Valdés LLC, 270 Muñoz Rivera Ave., Hato Rey PR 00918 in the manner prescribed

by the Federal Rules. The following Requests are to be read in accordance with the Definitions

and Instructions below. Womply reserves the right to serve additional Requests.

                                           DEFINITIONS

        The following Definitions apply throughout these Requests without regard to

capitalization.

       1.         “2021 Transfer” refers to the transfer or transfers of approximately $171 million

from Benworth FL to Benworth PR during the Summer of 2021, as referenced in the B. Navarro

Deposition at 326:10–21, 327:21–328:6.
     Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM           Document 182-8         Filed 12/06/24      Page 3 of 11




        2.     “ALSA” means the Amended Loan Servicing Agreement, dated September 23,

2021, by and between Benworth FL and Benworth PR.

        3.     “B. Navarro Deposition” refers to the deposition of Mr. Navarro in the JAMS

Arbitration styled, Oto Analytics, Inc. (d/b/a Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, Ref.

No. 1210038203, on October 26, 2022, and December 16, 2022.

        4.     “B. Navarro Entity” refers to (i) any entity in which Mr. Navarro has or had voting

or operational control during the Relevant Time Period; (ii) any entity in which Mr. Navarro holds

or held a majority ownership or equity interest, either directly or indirectly, during the Relevant

Time Period; or (iii) any trust or similar entity for which Mr. Navarro is or was a beneficiary or

beneficial owner during the Relevant Time Period.

        5.     “BDO Business” refers to the “business” between You and the accounting firm

“BDO”, as referenced in the B. Navarro deposition at 348:15–349:23.

        6.     “Benworth FL” refers to Benworth Capital Partners LLC and its members,

managers, agents, partners, owners, associates, employees, representatives, consultants,

predecessors in interest, successors, subsidiaries, assignees, licensees, or other persons acting or

purporting to act on their behalf, and all of their present or former subsidiaries, divisions, and/or

affiliates.

        7.     “Benworth PR” refers to Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC and its members,

managers, agents, partners, owners, associates, employees, representatives, consultants,

predecessors in interest, successors, subsidiaries, assignees, licensees, or other persons acting or

purporting to act on their behalf, and all of their present or former subsidiaries, divisions, and/or

affiliates.




                                                -2-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM             Document 182-8         Filed 12/06/24      Page 4 of 11




       8.      “Communication(s)” includes every manner or method of disclosure or transfer or

exchange of information however made.          This includes without limitation communications

conducted in person, by telephone, mail, email, text message, chat, instant message, facsimile,

personal delivery, or otherwise.

       9.      “Concerning” includes without limitation referring to, alluding to, responding to,

relating to, connected with, commenting on, in respect of, about, regarding, discussing, showing,

describing,   mentioning,     reflecting,   analyzing,    comprising,    constituting,   evidencing,

memorializing, pertaining to, and/or supporting.

       10.     “Dividend Payments” refers to the payment(s) made by Benworth FL to Mr.

Navarro of “at least $48,240,502.75, a portion of which was paid between 2021 and 2023,” as

described in Paragraph 53 of the complaint filed in the action styled Federal Reserve Bank of San

Francisco v. Benworth Capital Partners PR LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-01313 (D.P.R.).

       11.     “Document(s)” includes without limitation any Communications, writings,

drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phone records, tape recordings, notes, diaries, calendars,

checkbooks, books, papers, accounts, audio, electronic or videotape recordings, emails, text messages,

and any computer-generated, computer-stored, or electronically-stored matter, and other data

compilations from which information can be obtained and translated, if necessary, into reasonably

useable form, including documents stored on laptop computers, personal digital assistants (PDAs),

Blackberrys, iPhones, iPads, and other similar devices.

       12.     “LSA” refers to the Loan Servicing Agreement, dated May 31, 2021, by and

between Benworth FL and Benworth PR.

       13.     “Mr. Navarro” refers to Defendant Bernardo Navarro.

       14.     “November 2022 H&K Letter” refers to the letter dated November 21, 2022, from

Wilfredo A. Ferrer, on behalf of Benworth FL, to the Hon. James E. Clyburn.

                                                -3-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM            Document 182-8         Filed 12/06/24      Page 5 of 11




        15.     “Person” or “Persons” includes without limitation all natural persons,

corporations, partnerships, or other business associations and all other legal or governmental

entities or associations.

        16.     “Solicitation Process” refers to the process by which Benworth FL solicited

proposals for the services ultimately performed by Benworth FL under the LSA and/or the ALSA,

including without limitation from “Professional Bank, Lendio, Lenders Cooperative and . . .

BDO”, as discussed in the B. Navarro Deposition at 285:4–287:16, 348:3–349:15.

        17.     “Transfer Pricing Analysis” means the Transfer Pricing Analysis identified in the

November 2022 H&K Letter.

        18.     “You,” “Your,” or “Yours” refer to Mr. Navarro.

        19.     To bring within the scope of these Requests all information that might otherwise be

construed to be outside of their scope, the following rules of construction apply: (i) the masculine,

feminine, or neutral pronoun shall not exclude other genders; (ii) the word “including” shall be

read to mean including without limitation; (iii) the present tense shall be construed to include the

past tense and vice versa; (iv) references to members, managers, employees, officers, directors,

owners, agents, or representatives shall include both current and former members, managers,

employees, officers, directors, owners, agents, and representatives; (v) the words “and” and “or”

shall be construed in the conjunctive or disjunctive, whichever makes the request more inclusive;

(vi) the words “any” and “all” are interchangeable; (vii) the use of the singular form of any word

includes the plural and vice versa.

        20.     All words and phrases not otherwise defined herein shall be construed in

accordance with their plain and ordinary meaning.




                                                -4-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM            Document 182-8         Filed 12/06/24        Page 6 of 11




                                        INSTRUCTIONS

       1.      For the purpose of reading, interpreting, or construing the scope of these Requests,

the terms used shall be given their most expansive and inclusive interpretation.

       2.      Unless instructed otherwise, each Request shall be construed independently and not

by reference to any other Request for the purpose of limitation or exclusion, except that each

Request shall not be construed to call for Documents that are called for by previous Requests.

       3.      You must respond to each Request separately and fully, unless it is objected to. If

You object to any Request, or to any Definition or Instruction applicable thereto, state with

specificity the objection and legal basis for such objection with citations to appropriate legal

foundations for such objection. If You object to only a portion of the Request, or to any Definition

or Instruction applicable thereto, answer the portion of the Request to which You do not object.

       4.      If, in responding to these Requests, You claim any ambiguity in interpreting a

Request, or in a Definition or Instruction applicable thereto, You should not use that claim as a

basis for refusing to respond, but You shall set forth as part of Your response to such Request the

language deemed to be ambiguous and the interpretation used in responding to the Request.

       5.      In responding to these Requests, You are required to produce all requested

Documents in Your possession, custody, or control, including without limitation all requested

Documents in the possession, custody, or control of any of Your predecessors, successors,

assignees, principals, owners, employees, agents, attorneys, or other Persons acting or purporting

to act on Your behalf, regardless of location.

       6.      If any portion of a Document is responsive to any Request, the entire Document

shall be produced.

       7.      The Documents shall be produced as they are kept in the ordinary course of

business.

                                                 -5-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM            Document 182-8         Filed 12/06/24     Page 7 of 11




       8.      In the event that a copy of a Requested Document is not identical to any other copy

of the same Document in Your possession, custody, or control, all non-identical copies shall be

produced. A Document shall be deemed to be within Your control if You have the right to secure

the Document or a copy of the Document from another person having possession or custody of the

Document.

       9.      The fact that a Document is produced by another party does not relieve You of Your

obligation to produce Your copy of the same Document, even if the two Documents are identical.

       10.     If any of these Documents cannot be produced in full, produce them to the extent

possible, specifying the reasons for Your inability to produce the remainder and stating whatever

information, knowledge, or belief You have concerning the unproduced portion.

       11.     If You withhold any of the requested Documents or portions of Documents under

a claim of privilege, immunity, or protection, including the attorney-client privilege or work-

product doctrine, You shall provide a written privilege log that sets forth the information required

by Rule 26(b)(5) of the Federal Rules.

       12.     If information is redacted or otherwise withheld from a Document produced in

response to a Request, You shall identify the redaction or otherwise withheld information by

stamping the word “Redacted” on the Document at each place from which information has been

redacted or otherwise withheld, and separately log each such redaction on the privilege log.

       13.     Documents, including but not limited to electronically stored information, shall be

produced as TIFF image files and document-level extracted text or optical character recognition

(OCR) text files for scanned documents and redacted documents, and shall be accompanied by an

image load file (OPT file) and a metadata load file (DAT file). Documents shall be delivered on

CD, DVD, USB, or hard drive media, or by file transfer protocol, with clearly marked Bates ranges.



                                               -6-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM           Document 182-8        Filed 12/06/24      Page 8 of 11




Womply is available to confer about a stipulation regarding electronically stored information and

a protective order and confidentiality agreement pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules.

       14.     Unless otherwise specified, these Requests pertain to the period January 1, 2021 to

the present (the “Relevant Time Period”).

       15.     These Requests are continuing in nature. If You discover further or different

information, You are required to serve supplementary and amended responses relevant to any of

these Request and/or produce additional Documents.

                              REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION

       1.      All Documents and Communications Concerning the drafting and negotiation of

the LSA.

       2.      All Documents and Communications Concerning the drafting and negotiation of

the ALSA.

       3.      All Documents and Communications Concerning the 2021 Transfer.

       4.      All Documents and Communications Concerning any payments or transfers You

received from Benworth FL, including without limitation the Dividend Payments.

       5.      All Documents and Communications Concerning any payments or transfers You

received from Benworth PR.

       6.      All Documents and Communications Concerning any payments or transfers made

to a B. Navarro Entity by Benworth FL.

       7.      All Documents and Communications Concerning any payments or transfers made

to a B. Navarro Entity by Benworth PR.

       8.      All Documents and Communications Concerning the Solicitation Process.




                                              -7-
    Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM            Document 182-8       Filed 12/06/24      Page 9 of 11




       9.      All contracts and agreements between You and Benworth FL, including without

limitation all employment agreements, consulting agreements, services agreements, ownership

agreements, and voting agreements.

       10.     All contracts and agreements between You and Benworth PR, including without

limitation all employment agreements, consulting agreements, services agreements, ownership

agreements, and voting agreements.

       11.     All contracts and agreements between a B. Navarro entity and Benworth FL.

       12.     All contracts and agreements between a B. Navarro entity and Benworth PR.

       13.     All Documents and Communications Concerning the formation of Benworth PR.

       14.     All Documents and Communications Concerning the solvency of Benworth FL.

       15.     All Documents and Communications Concerning the services performed by

Benworth PR, including without limitation all Documents and Communications between You and

any members or employees of the United States Small Business Administration, the United States

Congress, or the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

       16.     Documents sufficient to show your home address.

       17.     All Documents identified, directly or indirectly, in Your answers to Womply’s First

Set of Interrogatories to You, dated July 19, 2024.




                                               -8-
   Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM          Document 182-8   Filed 12/06/24    Page 10 of 11




Dated: July 19, 2024


Of Counsel:

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP                             Respectfully submitted,

Alexander L. Cheney (admitted pro hac vice)              By: Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz
333 Bush Street
San Francisco, CA 94104                                  Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz
(415) 858-7400                                           USDC-PR 222110
acheney@willkie.com                                      McConnell Valdés LLC
                                                         270 Muñoz Rivera Ave.
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice)               Hato Rey PR 00918
787 Seventh Avenue                                       Tel: (787) 250-5637
New York, NY 10019                                       Email: ajc@mcvpr.com
(212) 728-8882
slombardi@willkie.com

Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice)
1875 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 303-1000                                           Attorneys for Plaintiff Oto
jlevy@willkie.com                                        Analytics, LLC




                                              -9-
   Case 3:23-cv-01034-GMM           Document 182-8          Filed 12/06/24     Page 11 of 11




                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served
on the following counsel of record, this 19th day of July 2024, by electronic mail at the email
addresses indicated below:


     Monica Del Pilar Ramos-Benitez                         Carla S. Loubriel
     Roberto A. Camara-Fuertes                              Ricardo F. Casellas
     Jaime A. Torrens-Davila                                CASELLAS ALCOVER &
     FERRAIUOLI LLC                                         BURGOS, P.S.C.
     221 Ponce de Leon Ave.                                 208 Ponce de Leon Ave.
     Suite 500                                              Popular Center Bldg. Suite 1400
     San Juan, PR 00917                                     Hato Rey, PR 00918
     (787) 766-7000                                         (787) 756-1400
     mramos@ferraiuoli.com                                  cloubriel@cabprlaw.com
     rcamara@ferraiuoli.com                                 rcasellas@cabprlaw.com
     jtorrens@ferraiuoli.com

                                                            Counsel for Defendants Benworth
     Jorge L. Piedra (admitted pro hac vice)                Capital Partners PR LLC and
     Dwayne Robinson (admitted pro hac vice)                Claudia Navarro
     Michael R. Lorigas (admitted pro hac vice)
     Rasheed K. Nader (admitted pro hac vice)
     KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON
     2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard,
     9th Fl.
     Miami, Florida 33134
     (305) 372-1800
     jpiedra@kttlaw.com
     drobinson@kttlaw.com
     mlorigas@kttlaw.com
     rnader@kttlaw.com

     Counsel for Defendants Benworth Capital
     Partners LLC and Bernardo Navarro




                                                             By: /s/ Alejandro J. Cepeda Diaz

                                                      Attorney for Plaintiff Oto Analytics, LLC




                                             - 10 -


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.prd.175040.182.8.pdf
Size
470,906 bytes
SHA-256
44fb7dfc616735064ecd510b922c625c21b941f922165e581356763613437919
Our copy
gov.uscourts.prd.175040.182.8.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top