Order of Forfeiture — United States of America v. Nadine Consuelo Jackson (Case No. 3:20-cr-112, Doc 52)

Summary

A final order of forfeiture in United States v. Nadine Consuelo Jackson, Case No. 3:20-cr-112, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, dated August 25, 2021 (Doc #: 52). The order recites that on March 12, 2021, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) covering funds of $1,236,817.00 and $47,979.70 seized from accounts maintained in the name of Extract LLC, and a money judgment of $1,290,817.00 against the defendant. It states that notice was given and the defendant did not object. The order forfeits the subject property to the United States, directs its disposal and retains jurisdiction under Rule 32.2(e). It is signed by United States District Judge Michael J. Newman.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Case: 3:20-cr-00112-MJN Doc #: 52 Filed: 08/25/21 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 253




                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
                                   WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          :       Case No. 3:20-cr-112

                Plaintiff,                         :       Judge Michael J. Newman

        v.                                         :

NADINE CONSUELO JACKSON,                           :

                Defendant.                         :


                               FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

        Upon the United States’ Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court’s review of the

record, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT:

        On March 12, 2021, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, finding that all

right, title, and interest in the following property (the “subject property”) had been forfeited to the

United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c):

        a.      Funds seized from River Valley Credit Union, Account Number ending in 7284,
                maintained in the name of Extract LLC, in the amount of $1,236,817.00; and

        b.      Funds seized from Radius Bank, Account Number ending in 4839, maintained in
                the name of Extract LLC, in the amount of $47,979.70.

The Court also entered a money judgment in the amount of $1,290,817.00 against the defendant.

        The Court found that the defendant had an interest in the subject property and directed the

United States to seize the subject property and to give notice of its intent to forfeit the property.

        The United States gave electronic notice through the CM/ECF notification system of the

Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to counsel for the defendant, and the defendant did not

object to the forfeiture.

        On March 16, 2021, the Court held the defendant’s sentencing hearing. The Amended

   Case: 3:20-cr-00112-MJN Doc #: 52 Filed: 08/25/21 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 254




Judgment establishes that the defendant shall forfeit the subject property to the United States.

       The United States published notice of this forfeiture action and of its intent to dispose of

the subject property in accordance with the law on an official internet government forfeiture site

(www.forfeiture.gov) for at least 30 consecutive days, beginning on March 16, 2021.

       The United States did not send direct written notice of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture

because there was no person or entity who reasonably appeared to be a potential claimant with

standing to contest the forfeiture of the subject property in the ancillary proceeding.

       No person or entity has filed a timely petition with the Court asserting any interest in the

subject property or objecting to its proposed forfeiture.

       THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

       1.      All right, title, and interest in the subject property is condemned and forfeited to the

United States under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

       2.      The United States shall dispose of the subject property in accordance with the law.

       3.      The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose

of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture and to amend it as necessary pursuant to Rule 32.2(e)

of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: August 25, 2021                          s/Michael J. Newman
                                               HONORABLE MICHAEL J. NEWMAN
                                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




                                                  2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.ohsd.247008.52.0.pdf

Size

119,421 bytes

SHA-256

81308b4b3067b0a9d86a47124c7569b5ab59b8b6aaffc268f6062514292c263b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.ohsd.247008.52.0.pdf

Original

archive.org