Text of Proposed Order — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 36-2, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Summary

A proposed order in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC, Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Document 36-2, filed April 22, 2022. Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion for Accounting, the order would grant the motion and require Defendant to produce, within 21 days, an accounting that answers listed questions. The questions ask how many of the 494,415 SBA-approved PPP borrowers Defendant committed to fund were not funded, how much in PPPLF and other cash advances Defendant received but did not fund, where those proceeds are, and how much in PPP loan processing fees Defendant obtained on the unfunded loans. The order names Honorable John M. Gallagher, U.S.D.J.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
 
ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL PRONSKY, 
PARIS TOWNSEND, NANCILEE 
HOLLAND, LEONA OWSLEY, KOLAWOLE 
AHMADOU, KIANA DERVIN, KRISTINA 
HENDERSON, DUSTIN INNIS, KELLY 
STALNAKER and JAMIE JONES, individually 
and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
 
v. 
 
PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC, 
 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
 
Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for Accounting and good cause appearing 
therefore, the Court ORDERS as follows: 
1. 
Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED; 
2. 
Within 21 days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall produce to Plaintiffs an 
accounting that accounts for and answers the following questions: 
a. 
How many of the 494,415 Small Business Administration-approved 
Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) borrowers that Defendant 
committed to fund did Defendant fail to fund?   
 
b. 
How much in federally-originated Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity 
Facility (“PPPLF”) and other cash advances did Defendant receive that it 
failed to fund to SBA-approved PPP borrowers? 
 
c. 
Where are those unfunded proceeds presently?   
 
d. 
If Defendant paid any such PPPLF and other cash advances to others, 
when and to whom and how much and why?   
 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 36-2     Filed 04/22/22     Page 1 of 2

2 
 
e. 
How much in PPP loan processing fees did Defendant obtain on the 
unfunded loans of Plaintiffs and the members of the proposed classes? 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of ___________________, 2022. 
 
 
____________________________________ 
Honorable John M. Gallagher, U.S.D.J. 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 36-2     Filed 04/22/22     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.36.2.pdf

Size

60,741 bytes

SHA-256

861b58a7326c46506ad06dc9c19acfa9368e264996c1b2d9e0a92591082004e0

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.36.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)