Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Andrew Marnell — magistrate docket, C.D. Cal. Consent to Video/Telephonic Conference — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Doc. 11, C.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Consent to Video/Telephonic Conference — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Doc. 11, C.D. Cal.)

Summary

A consent to video or telephonic conference form filed as Document 11 in United States v. Andrew Marnell, CASE NUMBER 20-MJ-3313, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, submitted by Deputy Federal Public Defender Adithya Mani. After consulting with counsel, Marnell consents to having certain proceedings, including detention and bail hearings, his initial appearance and arraignment, take place by video conference or, if unavailable, by telephone. The form is signed for the defendant by counsel with his authorization.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed July 16, 2020 in United States v. Andrew Marnell magistrate; one of 11 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2020-07-16

Cite this document

“Consent to Video/Telephonic Conference — United States v. Andrew Marnell (Doc. 11, C.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:20-mj-03313-DUTY, Doc. 11, filed 2020-07-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-marnell-cacd-788492/2020-07-16-indictment-doc-11/, SHA-256 a134187676703dc9be00376c0d94dd351311b33985ea3c23f16bc7ca27dd9529.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

NAME &ADDRESS
ADITHYA MANI (Bar No. 301880)
(E Mail: Adithya_Mani@fd.org)
Deputy Federal Public Defender
321 E. 2nd St., Los Angeles, CA 90012
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
~/. 16 ~0
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PLAINTIFF, 
20-MJ-3313
V.
ANDREW MARNELL 
CONSENT TO VIDEO/TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE
AND/OR WAIVER OF DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE
DEFENDANT(S). 
~ 
AND PROPOSED FINDINGS/ORDER
Check each that applies:
CONSENT TO VIDEO CONFERENCE/TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE 
~ 
WAIVER OF DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE
1. Consent to Video Conference/Telephonic Conference
I, ANDREW MARNELL 
,understand that the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure, and/or one or more federal statutes may give me the right to have all the below-listed proceedings take place in person in
open court. After consultation with counsel, I knowingly and voluntarily consent to the proceedings below instead taking place by
video conference or, if video conference is not reasonably available, by telephonic conference:
Check each that applies:
K
X Detention/Bail Review/Reconsideration Hearings) (18 U.S.C. Sec. 3142) 
OX Initial Appearance (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5)
0 Preliminary Hearing (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1) 
❑X Arraignment (Fed. R. Crim. P. 10)
K
X Pretrial Release Revocation Proceedings (18 U.S.C. Sec. 3148) 
~ 
Waiver of Indictment (Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b))
Misdemeanor Pleas and Sentencings (Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(2)) 
~X Appearances under Fed. R. Crim. P. 40
Probation and Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1)
Note: to consent to an appearance by video or telephonic conference at one of the two proceedings listed below, you must also complete
the "Proposed Findings"section on page 2 of this form.
Felony Pleas (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11) 
~ 
Felony Sentencings (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32)
2. Waiver of Defendant's Presence
I, 
,understand that the U.S. Constitution, the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure, and/or one or more federal statutes may give me the right to be present at all of the below-listed proceedings - in person,
by video conference, or by telephonic conference. After consultation with counsel, I knowingly and voluntarily waive my right to be
present in person in open court or by video conference or by telephonic conference at the proceedings below:
Check each that applies (and use Form CR-35 to waive the defendant's presence at other types of proceedings):
Detention/Bail Review/Reconsideration Hearings) (18 U.S.C. Sec. 3142) 
~ 
Waiver of Indictment (Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b))
Preliminary Hearing (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1) 
~ 
Appearances under Fed. R. Crim. P. 40
Pretrial Release Revocation Proceedings (18 U.S.C. Sec. 3148)
Misdemeanor Pleas and Sentencings (Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(2))
Probation and Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1)
July i6> 2020 
~9~~~ `~~ ~~l,~'1"
Date 
Defendant
Signed for Defendant by Counsel for Defendant with
~ Defendant's Authorization [Check if applicable]
CR-029 (06120) 
CONSENT TO VIDEO/TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE AND/OR WAIVER OF DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE 
P. I OF 2
Case 2:20-mj-03313-DUTY     Document 11     Filed 07/16/20     Page 1 of 2   Page ID #:112

I have translated this consent/waiver to the Defendant in the
Date
language.
Interpreter (if required)
Signed for Interpreter by Counsel for Defendant with
~ Interpreter's Authorization [Check if applicable]
I am counsel for the Defendant herein. Prior to the Defendant signing this document or authorizing me to sign this document on the
Defendant's behalf, I fully advised the Defendant of the Defendant's above-referenced rights and consulted with the Defendant
regarding such rights and the Defendant's consent/waiver(s). I believe that the Defendant understands such rights and that the
Defendant's consent/waiver(s) are knowing and voluntary, and I concur with such consent/waiver(s).
July i6, 2020 
~;~'~~'L~- ~~jY1~,--~
Date 
Counsel for Defendant
3. 
Proposed Findings Regarding Harm of Further Delay of Felony Plea or Sentencing
Pursuant to 4 15002(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act and 4 2 of Order of the Chief Judge
No. 20-043 (In Re: Coronavirus Public Emergenry Use of Video and Telephonic Conference in Certain Criminal Proceedings), felony
pleas and sentencings cannot be conducted other than in person in open court unless the judge makes specific findings that the plea
or sentencing "cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice." Accordingly, if the defendant intends to
consent to a felony plea or sentencing taking place by video conference or, if video conference is not reasonably available, by
telephonic conference, instead of in person in open court, the defendant must set forth below proposed findings sufficient to make
this showing.
4.Order Adopting Findings Regarding Harm of Further Delay of Felony Plea or Sentencing
Pursuant to § 15002(b)(2) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act and 4 2 of Order of the Chief Judge
No. 20-043 (In Re: Coronavirus Public Emergenry Use of Video and Telephonic Conference in Certain Criminal Proceedings), I
hereby find that the:
Felony Plea (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11) 
~ 
Felony Sentencing (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32)
in this case cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the reasons set forth above.
Date
United States District Judge
CR-029 (06/20) 
CONSENT TO VIDEO/TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE AND/OR WAIVER OF DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE 
P. 2 OF 2
Case 2:20-mj-03313-DUTY     Document 11     Filed 07/16/20     Page 2 of 2   Page ID #:113

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.788492.11.0.pdf
Size
239,148 bytes
SHA-256
a134187676703dc9be00376c0d94dd351311b33985ea3c23f16bc7ca27dd9529
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.788492.11.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top