RESPONSE in Support by USA as to Martin Kao re 190 MOTION for Hearing for Restitution Pursuant… — USA v. Kao (Dkt. 193)

Summary

Government's Response to Movant PacMar Technologies LLC's Renewed Motion for Restitution Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and § 3664 (ECF 190), Document 193, filed 03/26/26, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, United States of America v. Martin Kao, Crim. No. 21-00061 LEK. The United States concurs in the arguments and request for restitution set forth in PacMar's Renewed Motion. The government requests that the Court order Defendant Martin Kao to pay restitution to PacMar as requested in that motion. The response is dated March 26, 2026, carries the /s/ signature of Craig S. Nolan, and has a certificate of service naming counsel for the defendant, for Tiffany Lam and for PacMar Technologies LLC.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

KENNETH M. SORENSON 
United States Attorney 
 
 
       
District of Hawaii  
 
 
       
 
CRAIG S. NOLAN 
 
 
            
Assistant U.S. Attorney  
       
Room 6100, PJKK Federal Building        
300 Ala Moana Blvd. 
 
 
       
Honolulu, Hawaii  96850  
 
       
Telephone:  (808) 541-2850 
 
       
Facsimile:  (808) 541-2958 
 
       
Email: Craig.Nolan@usdoj.gov     
       
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
 
v. 
 
MARTIN KAO,          
 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
Crim. No. 21-00061 LEK 
 
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE  
TO MOVANT PACMAR 
TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S RENEWED 
MOTION FOR RESTITUTION 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3663A 
AND § 3664 (ECF 190) 
 
 
 
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE TO MOVANT 
PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC’S RENEWED MOTION FOR 
RESTITUTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3663A AND § 3664 (ECF 190) 
 
The United States of America concurs in the arguments and request for 
restitution set forth in PacMar Technologies LLC’s Renewed Motion for 
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK     Document 193     Filed 03/26/26     Page 1 of 3  PageID.2442

2 
Restitution Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and § 3664 (ECF 190).  For the reasons 
articulated therein and those found in the government’s earlier submissions and 
arguments to the Court, the government respectfully requests that the Court order 
Defendant Martin Kao to pay restitution to PacMar as requested in PacMar’s 
Renewed Motion. 
DATED: March 26, 2026, at Honolulu, Hawaii. 
KENNETH M. SORENSON 
United States Attorney 
District of Hawaii 
 
By /s/ Craig S. Nolan 
CRAIG S. NOLAN 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK     Document 193     Filed 03/26/26     Page 2 of 3  PageID.2443

3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that, on the date noted below, a true and correct copy of the 
foregoing was served on the following by the specified method of service. 
By CM/ECF electronic filing system 
Randall K. Hironaka, Esq. 
Attorney for Defendant Marin Kao 
 
Philip Miyoshi, Esq. 
Attorney for Tiffany Lam 
 
David M. Louie, Esq. 
Jesse W. Schiel, Esq. 
Attorneys for PacMar Technologies LLC 
 
By email 
 
Sara Nieling 
United States Probation Officer 
 
DATED: March 26, 2026, at Honolulu, Hawaii. 
 
/s/ Craig S. Nolan 
Craig S. Nolan 
U.S. Attorney’s Office 
District of Hawaii 
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK     Document 193     Filed 03/26/26     Page 3 of 3  PageID.2444

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.hid.154418.193.0.pdf

Size

129,899 bytes

SHA-256

7040fce79aa3e16fa295ae98e4b1df61f785aa175049f9731738c09ad5eb6432

Our copy

gov.uscourts.hid.154418.193.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)