Court filing

Due Process Protections Act Order — United States v. Lentine (Dkt. 7, S.D. Ohio)

Summary

Under the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminded the government of its Brady v. Maryland duty to disclose evidence favorable to Joseph Lentine and material to guilt or punishment. Failure to comply in a timely manner may bring dismissal of charges, exclusion of evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, contempt or sanctions.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 10, 2021 in Joseph Lentine; one of 1 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Filed	2021-09-10

Cite this document

“Due Process Protections Act Order — United States v. Lentine (Dkt. 7, S.D. Ohio).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, No. 1:21-mj-00633, Doc. 7, filed 2021-09-10. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-joseph-lentine-ohsd-259536/2021-09-10-gov-uscourts-ohsd-259536-7-0-doc-7/, SHA-256 597c3aa22d06b440aa6ee7fdc6a2b08278e8090abd1e1cf3afb749ec6de417ad.

Full text

Case: 1:21-mj-00633-KLL Doc #: 7 Filed: 09/10/21 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 52




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
                                   WESTERN DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           Case No. 1:21-mj-00633

                Plaintiff,

           V.

JOSEPH LENTINE,

                Defendant.

                      DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS ACT ORDER

      Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of

its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to disclose evidence

favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The

government is ordered to comply with Brady and its progeny. The failure to do so in a

timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or

information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions,

dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court, or any other

remedy that is just under the circumstances.

       SO ORDERED.




                                          M JttiJ{tiaWtY-,__,
                                           Stepanie K. Bowman
                                           United States Magistrate Judge

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.ohsd.259536.7.0.pdf
Size: 187,532 bytes
SHA-256: 597c3aa22d06b440aa6ee7fdc6a2b08278e8090abd1e1cf3afb749ec6de417ad
Our copy: gov.uscourts.ohsd.259536.7.0.pdf
Original: archive.org