Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Jia Bei Zhu case — U.S. District Court, E.D. Cal. Detention Order — United States v. Zhu (Dkt. 19, E.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Detention Order — United States v. Zhu (Dkt. 19, E.D. Cal.)

Summary

A detention order in United States v. Jia Bei Zhu, aka David He, No. 23 CR 00219 ADA BAM, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, dated and filed November 22, 2023 as Document 19. After a detention hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the court orders the defendant detained, finding by a preponderance of the evidence that no conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance and that the defendant will obstruct justice. The checked findings describe the charged crimes as Distribution of Adulterated and Misbranded Medical Devices and False Statements and the weight of the evidence as high. They also list no known family ties in the area, no steady employment or substantial financial resources, no significant community ties, and strong overseas ties to China and Canada.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed November 22, 2023 in Jia Bei Zhu; one of 8 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Filed2023-11-22

Cite this document

“Detention Order — United States v. Zhu (Dkt. 19, E.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. 1:23-cr-00219, Doc. 19, filed 2023-11-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-jia-bei-zhu-caed-437410/2023-11-22-gov-uscourts-caed-437410-19-0-doc-19/, SHA-256 a5333d96c64543cfd3abb19c036dde7c0707222460d8b627cbceb90b60d3d9ef.

Full text

UNITED STATES
             Case 1:23-cr-00219-ADA-BAM      DISTRICT
                                         Document      COURT
                                                  19 Filed 11/22/23 Page 1 of 2
                                   EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                     No. 23 CR 00219 ADA BAM

                          Plaintiff,

        v.                                                    DETENTION ORDER

JIA BEI ZHU, AKA DAVID HE,

                       Defendant.

A. Order For Detention
   After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the
   above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).

B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention
   The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds:
   X    By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
        assure the appearance of the defendant as required and by preponderance of the evidence that the defendant
        will obstruct justice. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3142(f)(2)(A) and (B).
        By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
        assure the safety of any other person and the community.

C. Findings of Fact
   The Court’s findings are based on the evidence which was presented in Court and that which was contained in the
   Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:
   X    (1) Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged:
               (a) The crime, Distribution of Adulterated and Misbranded Medical Devices and False Statements, is a
               serious crime and carries a maximum penalty of 3 and years, respectively
               (b) The offense is a crime of violence.
               (c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
               (d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances.
   X    (2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is high.
   X    (3) The history and characteristics of the defendant including:
               (a) General Factors:
                             The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the
                             defendant will appear.
                     X       The defendant has no known family ties in the area.
                     X       The defendant has no known steady employment.
                     X       The defendant has no known substantial financial resources.
                     X       The defendant is not a long time resident of the community.
                     X       The defendant does not have any known significant community ties.
                     X       Past conduct of the defendant : defendant has strong overseas ties to China and Canada
                     X       The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
                             The defendant has a history relating to alcohol abuse.
                             The defendant has a significant prior criminal record.
                             The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.
                             The defendant has a history of violating probation and/or parole.



                                                          1

Defendant: JIA BEI ZHU, AKA DAVID HE                                        Page 2 or 2
           Case 1:23-cr-00219-ADA-BAM Document 19 Filed 11/22/23 Page 2 of 2
Case Number: 23 CR 00219 ADA BAM

            (b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court;
                        At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:
                               Probation
                               Parole
                               Release pending trial, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence.
             (c) Other Factors:
                               The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
                         X     The defendant is subject to deportation if convicted.
                               Other:
         (4) The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release are as follows:
         (5) Rebuttable Presumptions
             In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the following
             rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court finds the
             defendant has not rebutted:
                    a.         The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1).
                               (A) a crime of violence; or
                               (B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death; or
                               (C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten years or
                               more; or
                               (D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior offenses
                               described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior conviction of one of the
                               crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which is less than five years old and which
                               was committed while the defendant was on pretrial release
                    b. There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for which a
                        maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed
                               in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.,
                               the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq.,
                               the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq., or
                               an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b.
                               an offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1),
                               2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2),
                               2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

D.       Additional Directives
         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:

        The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility
separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

         The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and

        That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for
the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:      November 22, 2023
                                                        UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


                                                              2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.caed.437410.19.0.pdf
Size
117,976 bytes
SHA-256
a5333d96c64543cfd3abb19c036dde7c0707222460d8b627cbceb90b60d3d9ef
Our copy
gov.uscourts.caed.437410.19.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top