Court filing
Order Setting Hearing via Video Conference — United States v. David Tyler Hines (Dkt. 34, S.D. Fla.)
Summary
An order setting a hearing by video conference, entered 01/20/2021 as Document 34 in United States v. David Tyler Hines, Case 1:21-cr-20011-DPG in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Citing Administrative Order 2020-95 and limits on scheduling hearings with defendants in custody at FDC-Miami, the court sets Hines's change of plea hearing for February 10, 2021 at 11:00 a.m., by video conference if COVID-19 restrictions remain. It reminds remote observers that recording and rebroadcasting proceedings is prohibited. It explains how a defendant may consent to a remote hearing, including electronic signature or signature by counsel, and attaches a blank waiver of physical presence and consent form under the CARES Act for Hines to return before the hearing.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 20, 2021 in Hines; one of 85 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-01-20 |
Cite this document
“Order Setting Hearing via Video Conference — United States v. David Tyler Hines (Dkt. 34, S.D. Fla.).”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 1:21-cr-20011-DPG, Doc. 34, filed 2021-01-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-hines-flsd-584464/2021-01-20-information-doc-34/
, SHA-256 559e7b2438f786600c6775dc6cf5cf7d1017f196af5ada4056c9a0e35bd21c78.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 21-20011-CR-COOKE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Vs.
DAVID TYLER HINES,
Defendant(s).
______________________________________________ /
ORDER SETTING HEARING VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte. Given United States District Court,
Southern District of Florida’s Administrative Order 2020-95 entered on December 7, 2020;
and calendar restrictions in the Court’s ability to schedule hearings with defendants in
custody at FDC-Miami, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the change of plea hearing in this matter is
scheduled for February 10, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. If present COVID-19 restrictions are still in
place, the hearing may be held via video conference, with instructions to follow. Persons
granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against
photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. Violation of these
prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials,
restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions
deemed necessary by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
Because the CARES Act does not require the consent of a defendant to be in writing,
such consent may be obtained in the form most practicable under the circumstances, if the
defendant’s consent is clearly reflected in the record;
Case 1:21-cr-20011-DPG Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 1 of 4
If a written waiver is required, and if obtaining an actual signature is impractical
given the health and safety concerns presented: (i) a defendant may sign a document
electronically; or (ii) defense counsel may sign on the defendant’s behalf if the defendant,
after an opportunity to consult with counsel, consents; and
Defendant shall return the attached form at least one day prior to the scheduled
hearing.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 20th day of February 2021.
Cc: Counsel of record.
Case 1:21-cr-20011-DPG Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 2 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 21-20011-COOKE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID TYLER HINES,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
WAIVER OF PHYSICAL PRESENCE IN COURT AND CONSENT TO APPEAR
BY VIDEO OR TELECONFERENCE UNDER THE CARES ACT, PUB. L. NO.
116-136, 134 STAT. 281
COMES NOW Defendant David Tyler Hines, who states:
1. I have read the Indictment/Information/Petition (or it was read to me) and
understand the charges that have been brought against me.
2. I have consulted with my attorney. I understand that I am guaranteed the right to be
present at all criminal proceedings if my presence is critical to the outcome of the
proceeding and would contribute to the fairness of the proceeding.
3. I understand that the guaranteed right to be present means the right for me to be
present, in person in the courtroom, with my attorney, the prosecutor, and the judge.
4. I understand that I can waive the guaranteed right to appear in person and consent
to appear, at today’s hearing, by video teleconference or telephone conference.
5. I ____waive ____ do not waive (check one) my right to be present, in person in the
courtroom,
for
today’s
proceeding(s)
(name
proceeding(s)):
_________________________________________________________________,
and/or for all proceedings on Exhibit A attached hereto identified by checkmark and
the initials of the Defendant and/or Defendant’s attorney.
6. I ____ consent ____ do not consent (check one) to appearing by video
teleconference or telephone conference if video teleconference is not reasonably
available for today’s proceeding(s) (name proceeding(s)):
_________________________________________________________________,
Case 1:21-cr-20011-DPG Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 3 of 4
___________________________________
_________________________________
Defendant’s Signature1
Defense Counsel’s Signature
___________________________________
_________________________________
Defendant’s Name (printed)
Defense Counsel’s Name (printed)
___________________________________
_________________________________
Date
Date
ACCEPTED BY:
______________________________________
_________________________
MARCIA G. COOKE
Date
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, conformed signatures by permission will be accepted. If signed by
permission, defense counsel represents that Defendant gave express permission to apply his or her
signature.
Case 1:21-cr-20011-DPG Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2021 Page 4 of 4File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.584464.34.0.pdf
- Size
- 90,081 bytes
- SHA-256
- 559e7b2438f786600c6775dc6cf5cf7d1017f196af5ada4056c9a0e35bd21c78
- Original
- PACER (login required)