Notification of Docket Entry — Telephone Status Hearing Held; Continued to 4/1/2025

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · No. 1:24-cr-00424 · Doc. 53 · 2025-01-30 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A notification of docket entry made by the Clerk on January 30, 2025 in United States v. Francesco Distefano, et al., Case No. 1:24-cr-00424, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, as Document 53. The minute entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel records that a telephone status hearing was held and continued to April 1, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., with defendant Francesco Distefano present in custody by Webex. It states that an oral motion to waive the appearance of co-defendant Sargis Urumieh was granted. Without objection, the court excluded time from January 30, 2025 to April 1, 2025 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), citing the complexity of the case, the volume of discovery and the parties' efforts to resolve the case short of trial.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.8 (rev. 1.8.2)
Eastern Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 1:24−cr−00424
Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel
Francesco Distefano, et al.
Defendant.
NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 30, 2025:
            MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Telephone status hearing
held and continued to 4/1/2025 at 9:30 a.m. Defendant Francesco Distefano (1) present in
custody by Webex with the assistance of defense counsel. For the reasons stated on the
record, the oral motion to waive the appearance of Sargis Urumieh (2) is granted. Without
objection, time is excluded from 1/30/2025 to 4/1/2025 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)
for the reasons stated on the record and because the ends of justice served by a
continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
Specifically, the complexity of the case, the nature of the prosecution, the volume of
discovery, and the parties' efforts to resolve this case short of trial warrant the exclusion of
time. Mailed notice. (vcf, )
ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was
generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and
criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please
refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our
web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Case: 1:24-cr-00424 Document #: 53 Filed: 01/30/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:252

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.ilnd.464178.53.0.pdf

Size

17,139 bytes

SHA-256

7cf7442b6d2907758609d6a1d74007b0e8e2f36df1b575412048422ce896e028

Our copy

gov.uscourts.ilnd.464178.53.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)