Brady v. Maryland Notice as to Felicia Jackson Stanley — USA v. Stanley et al. (Dkt. 10, N.D. Fla.)

Summary

A Brady v. Maryland Notice, Doc. 10, in United States of America vs. Felicia Jackson Stanley, Case No. 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF, United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, dated June 28, 2022. Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence and orders the United States to do so. The notice states that failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. It is signed s/ Martin A. Fitzpatrick, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
vs. 
 
FELICIA JACKSON STANLEY, 
 
Defendant. 
/ 
 
 
Case No. 4:22cr32-MW 
 
 
 
BRADY v. MARYLAND NOTICE 
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the 
United States’ obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory 
evidence- that is, evidence that favors the Defendant or casts doubt on the 
United States’ case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 
and its progeny, and ORDERS the United States to do so.  The 
Government has a duty to disclose any evidence that goes to negating the 
defendant’s guilt, the credibility of a witness, or that would reduce a 
potential sentence.  The defendant is entitled to this information without a 
request.  Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may 
result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, 
adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, 
disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. 
 
DONE AND ORDERED on June 28, 2022. 
 
s/ Martin A. Fitzpatrick 
MARTIN A. FITZPATRICK 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Case 4:22-cr-00032-MW-MAF     Document 10     Filed 06/28/22     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flnd.433859.10.0.pdf

Size

104,512 bytes

SHA-256

baed8f4ffe9426ce4733e5ada7806dda4b6f14b75df1aeb2ad2a392c19e0d4f7

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flnd.433859.10.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)