Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Court filing

Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2023-06-23

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL · Doc. 317 · 2023-06-23 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A final order and judgment of forfeiture in United States of America v. Daniel Eric Jay, Case No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, filed June 23, 2023 as Document 317. The order recites that the court accepted the defendant's guilty plea to the Criminal Information and determined, based on that plea, that the defendant obtained $250,000.00 in proceeds. It orders the defendant to forfeit $250,000.00 to the United States as a personal money judgment and permits the Attorney General or a designee to conduct discovery to locate property subject to forfeiture under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3). The order becomes final as to the defendant at sentencing, and the United States may move under Rule 32.2(e) to substitute property with a value not exceeding $250,000.00. It is issued by United States District Judge Mark H. Cohen.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Criminal Action No.
V.
l:20-cr-228-MHC-JKL
DANIEL ERIC JAY
FINAL ORDER AND TUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
WHEREAS/ this Court accepted the guilty plea of the Defendant to the
Criminal Information and determined pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(l)(A) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure/ and based upon the guilty plea/ that the
Defendant committed offenses for which he individually obtained $250/000.00 in
proceeds/ and
WHEREAS/ the United States seeks a personal money judgment against the
Defendant in the amount of $250/000.00, and
WHEREAS/ Rule 32.2(c)(l) provides that //no ancillary proceeding is required
to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money judgment/'
NOW THEREFORE/ IT IS ORDERED/ ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $250/000.00, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 981(a)(l)(C)/ as incorporated by 28 USC 2461(c).
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that/ upon the entry of this Order/ the
United States Attorney General or his designee may conduct discovery to identify/
locate and facilitate the disposition of property subject to forfeiture in accordance
with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3).
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 317     Filed 06/23/23     Page 1 of 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction in this case
for the purpose of enforcing this Order and/ pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3)/ this Order
of Forfeiture shall become final as to the Defendant at the time of sentencing and
shall be made part of the sentence and included in the Judgment; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States may/ at any time/ move/
pursuant to Rule 32.2(e)/ to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property/
with a value not exceeding $250,000.00, to satisfy the money judgment in whole or
in part.
SO ORDERED THIS <^^-^^ day of JUNE/ 2023.
MARK H. COHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presented by:
AUSA Russell Phillips
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 317     Filed 06/23/23     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.317.0.pdf
Size
189,884 bytes
SHA-256
8845bfd08a118374410ddf8a886c40cfbd67246ac5e7bc9698adc3ae31ddb851
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.317.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top