Order of Detention Pending Trial (AO 472), Daniel Eric Jay — United States v. Maurice Fayne (Document 303)

Summary

An AO 472 Order of Detention Pending Trial filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on February 13, 2023 as Document 303 in United States of America v. Daniel Eric Jay, Case No. 1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL-2. The form states that, after a detention hearing, the court found that detention is warranted, and sets out its findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) and its analysis of the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). The order is three pages, dated 02/13/2023 over the signature line of a United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of Georgia
United States of America )
V. )
) Case No. 1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL-2
DANIEL ERIC JAY )
Defendant
ORDER OF DETENTION PENDmG TRIAL
Part I - Eligibility for Detention
Upon the
0 Motion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(l), or
3J Motion of the Government or Court's own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2),
the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court's findings of fact
and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), in addition to any other findings made at the hearing.
Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)
n A. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2) (previous violator): There is a rebuttable
presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
and the community because the following conditions have been met:
O (1) the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(l):
l~l(a) a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C.
§ 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; or
0 (b) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or
0(c) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
(21 U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508); or
1-1 (d) any felony if such person has been convicted of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs
(a) through (c) of this paragraph, or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses
described in subparagraphs (a) through (c) of this paragraph if a circumstance giving rise to Federal
jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or
0 (e) any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves:
(i) a minor victim; (ii) the possession of a firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921);
(iii) any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. § 2250; and
D (2) the defendant has previously been convicted of a Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3142(f)(l), or of a State or local offense that would have been such an offense if a circumstance giving rise
to Federal jurisdiction had existed; and
0 (3) the offense described in paragraph (2) above for which the defendant has been convicted was
committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and
0 (4) a period of not more than five years has elapsed since the date of conviction, or the release of the
defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph (2) above, whichever is later.
Page 1 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 303     Filed 02/13/23     Page 1 of 3

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial
H B. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3) (narcotics, firearm, other qffenses): There is a
rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant
committed one or more of the following offenses:
D (1) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801-904), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21
U.S.C. §§ 951-971), or Chapter 705 of Title 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. §§ 70501-70508);
a (2) an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b;
0 (3) an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years
or more is prescribed;
0 (4) an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18, U.S.C. (18 U.S.C. §§ 1581-1597) for which a maximum term of
imprisonment of 20 years or more is prescribed; or
0 (5) an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(l), 2245,
2251, 2251 A, 2252(a)(l), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(l), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4),
2260,2421,2422,2423,or 2425.
0 C. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above
H The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is
ordered on that basis. (Part in need not be completed.)
OR
0 The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, but after considering the
presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted.
Part III - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention
After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:
St By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the safety of any other person and the community.
0 By a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the defendant's appearance as required.
In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:
0 Weight of evidence against the defendant is strong
0 Subject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted
O Prior criminal history
0 Participation in criminal activity while on probation, parole, or supervision
D History of violence or use of weapons
1~1 History of alcohol or substance abuse
0 Lack of stable employment
1_) Lack of stable residence
0 Lack of financially responsible sureties
Page 2 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 303     Filed 02/13/23     Page 2 of 3

AO 472 (Rev. 11/16) Order of Detention Pending Trial
0 Lack of significant community or family ties to this district
D Significant family or other ties outside the United States
D Lack of legal status in the United States
1~) ^Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration
Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
0 Prior attempt(s) to evade law enforcement
H Use of alias(es) or false documents
D Background information unknown or unverified
I") Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release
OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:
// ^
0
Part TV - Directions Regarding Detention
The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to th^AttORI5)\ General's designated representative for
confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the ejrtent practicabl^&om persogA awaiting or serving sentences or being
held in custody pending appeal. The defendant mus^e afforde^a reasomaJile^bpportunity for private consultation with
defense counsel. On order of a court of the United State2~t»r o^frcqngsfof an attorney j3j>r the/Govemment^tih5)person in
charge of the corrections facility must deliver tl)e-defendasft~%^a United States Marshq^fqfr th^purp^se 0^1 appearance in
connection with a court proceeding.
Date:
02/13/2023
^
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 3 of 3
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 303     Filed 02/13/23     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.278523.303.0.pdf

Size

546,142 bytes

SHA-256

854e5561271f7f2398cd4a378c4ab2a9e554deebf3d3b73310ae7983419ee1de

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.278523.303.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)