Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Maurice Fayne, a/k/a Arkansas Mo, et al. — N.D. Ga. filings Order - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket (Doc. 296-1, filed 2023-01-18)

Court filing

Order - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket (Doc. 296-1, filed 2023-01-18)

Summary

A Brady v. Maryland Notice and Order of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, in United States v. Eric Daniel Jay, Case No. 4:23 MJ 6008, dated January 18, 2023. Under the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of its obligations under Brady v. Maryland to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The order directs the government to comply with Brady and its progeny. It states that failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings or sanctions. The order names Carmen E. Henderson, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2023-01-18

Cite this document

“Order - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket.” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, Doc. 296-1, filed 2023-01-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-fayne-gand-278523/2023-01-18-order-doc-296-1/, SHA-256 954443b4a6b0ddd65d19f1f282259011566bcc92aae58a41395f515a01ab1baf.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Ay  
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 
EASTERN DIVISION 
 
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. Law No. 116-182 (Oct. 21, 2020), the 
court gives NOTICE and ORDERS as follows:  
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of 
its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to disclose evidence favorable 
to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment. The government is 
ordered to comply with Brady and its progeny. The failure to do so in a timely manner may 
result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of 
government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, 
contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court, or any other remedy that is just under the 
circumstances.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: January 18, 2023 
 
 
 
______________________________ 
Carmen E. Henderson 
United States Magistrate Judge 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
v. 
 
ERIC DANIEL JAY, 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
 
Case No. 4:23 MJ 6008 
 
 
 
MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
CARMEN E. HENDERSON 
 
 
BRADY v. MARYLAND 
NOTICE AND ORDER 
Case: 4:23-mj-06008-CEH  Doc #: 3  Filed:  01/18/23  1 of 1.  PageID #: 28
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 296-1     Filed 01/18/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.296.1.pdf
Size
185,532 bytes
SHA-256
954443b4a6b0ddd65d19f1f282259011566bcc92aae58a41395f515a01ab1baf
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.296.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top