Court filing
Order - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket (Doc. 296-1, filed 2023-01-18)
Summary
A Brady v. Maryland Notice and Order of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, in United States v. Eric Daniel Jay, Case No. 4:23 MJ 6008, dated January 18, 2023. Under the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of its obligations under Brady v. Maryland to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment. The order directs the government to comply with Brady and its progeny. It states that failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings or sanctions. The order names Carmen E. Henderson, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-01-18 |
Cite this document
“Order - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket.”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, Doc. 296-1, filed 2023-01-18. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-fayne-gand-278523/2023-01-18-order-doc-296-1/
, SHA-256 954443b4a6b0ddd65d19f1f282259011566bcc92aae58a41395f515a01ab1baf.Full text
Ay IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. Law No. 116-182 (Oct. 21, 2020), the court gives NOTICE and ORDERS as follows: Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the court reminds the government of its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment. The government is ordered to comply with Brady and its progeny. The failure to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including dismissal of the indictment or information, exclusion of government evidence or witnesses, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, sanctions by the Court, or any other remedy that is just under the circumstances. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2023 ______________________________ Carmen E. Henderson United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC DANIEL JAY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:23 MJ 6008 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARMEN E. HENDERSON BRADY v. MARYLAND NOTICE AND ORDER Case: 4:23-mj-06008-CEH Doc #: 3 Filed: 01/18/23 1 of 1. PageID #: 28 Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL Document 296-1 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.gand.278523.296.1.pdf
- Size
- 185,532 bytes
- SHA-256
- 954443b4a6b0ddd65d19f1f282259011566bcc92aae58a41395f515a01ab1baf
- Original
- PACER (login required)