Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Court filing

Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2021-10-22

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL · Doc. 248 · 2021-10-22 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A transcript of a June 25, 2020 telephone conference before U.S. Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand in United States of America v. Maurice Fayne, No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, filed October 22, 2021 as Document 248. The conference addresses a motion by defense attorney Tanya Miller to withdraw as counsel, with Assistant United States Attorney Michael Brown appearing for the government. The defendant confirms that he consents to the withdrawal and wants court-appointed counsel. The judge grants the motion and, after reviewing a financial affidavit, finds the defendant eligible and appoints the Federal Defender Program. Defense counsel notes that the defendant plans to request a modification of his bond, and the six-page transcript is certified by the official court reporter on October 16, 2021.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
 
 
United States of America, 
 
       vs.                                   Docket No. 
                                         1:20-cr-00228-MHC 
Maurice Fayne, 
 
               Defendant. 
 
 
 
 
 
TRANSCRIPT OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 
BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUSTIN S. ANAND 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE COURT JUDGE 
THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2020 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Appearance of Counsel: 
 
For the Plaintiff:         Michael Brown, Esq. 
                           Assistant United States Attorney 
 
For the Defendant:         Tanya Miller, Esq. 
 
 
 
 
 
                           Judith M. Wolff, CRR 
                           Official Court Reporter 
                           1914 United States Courthouse 
                           75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W. 
                           Atlanta, Georgia  30303 
                           judith_wolff@gand.uscourts.gov 
Transcribed From Digitally-Recorded Audio
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 1 of 6

    2
(Court was called to order at 12:02 p.m.)
THE COURT:  Hi.  Good morning.  This is Judge Anand.
Do I have everybody on the line?
MS. MILLER:  Yes.  Good morning, your Honor.  Tanya
Miller, for Mr. Fayne.
THE COURT:  Hi.  Good morning, Ms. Miller.
MR. BROWN:  Yes.  Mike Brown, for the government.
THE COURT:  Morning, Mr. Brown.
MR. BROWN:  Morning.
THE COURT:  And is Mr. Fayne also on the line?
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.  Mr. Fayne here.
THE COURT:  All right.  Very good.
So I have received the motion from Ms. Miller to
withdraw and it wasn't clear whether Mr. Fayne was asking for
court-appointed counsel, but I did receive the financial
affidavit from Mr. Fayne.
So let me just confirm, Mr. Fayne, at this time, are
you wanting to apply for and receive court-appointed counsel
in this case?
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.  That is correct.
THE COURT:  Okay.  And you consent to Ms. Miller's
motion to withdraw as counsel?
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, sir.
THE COURT:  Ms. Miller, have you received any
retainer or funds that you are still in possession of that you
USA v Fayne         June 25, 2020        Motion to Withdraw
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 2 of 6

    3
have not yet returned to Mr. Fayne?
MS. MILLER:  Your Honor, I did receive a -- I did
receive funds.  They were not -- there was no retainer with a
flat fee for my services.
It was an agreement that we would settle on a
finalized fee once we adjourned the investigation, once
Mr. Fayne was formally indicted and we understood the scope of
his case.
And unfortunately, when that happened, and not to go
into too much detail with my discussion with Mr. Fayne, but he
is unable to pay any money at this time in part because he has
not been able to work.
But it is partly because much of what he had has been
seized by the government and he just does not have any money
at this time.
So there is no -- there was no retainer, billing
retainer situation.
THE COURT:  Okay.  And then all I was trying to get
at was whether or not you have any money that you've not yet
billed for that would be for returning to Mr. Fayne, but it
sounds like the answer to that is no, that whatever you were
paid is for services rendered already; is that correct?
MS. MILLER:  That is correct, your Honor.
THE COURT:  Okay.  All right.
So I will grant the motion.  
USA v Fayne         June 25, 2020        Motion to Withdraw
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 3 of 6

    4
And I have also reviewed the financial affidavit that
Mr. Fayne has submitted and I find that the information
provided for in that affidavit, along with the statement here,
qualifies him for a court-appointed counsel.
Obviously, there is a large amount of historical
income afforded, but we also have a substantial amount of
seizures, so I find on the basis of that information that he
is eligible for court-appointed counsel.  So I will grant that
application.
Mr. Brown, the Federal Defender Program is not
conflicted for this; is that correct?
MR. BROWN:  That's correct.
THE COURT:  All right.  So we will appoint the
Federal Defender Program.  I don't know which specific
attorney would receive that appointment, but we will reach out
to them, whoever is on duty, and they should receive that duty
and we will appoint them right away.
And that person will be in touch with you, Mr. Fayne,
as well as with Ms. Miller right away.
Anything else for today?
MS. MILLER:  No.  Not on behalf of Mr. Fayne, your
Honor.  
Except we do anticipate, just so that everyone is
aware, and I'm sure he will discuss this with whoever his
counsel is, and request for him to be able to start working
USA v Fayne         June 25, 2020        Motion to Withdraw
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 4 of 6

    5
again.
And he just wanted me to raise that, to let everyone
to know that, that he was planning to do that at some point in
the near future, formally request a modification of his bond.
THE COURT:  We will take that up when it's presented
and new counsel has had a chance to get up to speed.
Anything else, from the government?
MR. BROWN:  Nothing from the government.
THE COURT:  All right.  That will be that.
We will grant the motion, issue an order, and I
believe by the end of the day we should have the name of the
person.  If not, by tomorrow, but it will probably be today.
And then again that person will get in touch with
you, Mr. Fayne, and then we'll go forward here.
Otherwise, we will be in adjournment.
MS. MILLER:  Thank you, your Honor.
THE DEFENDANT:  Thank you.
MR. BROWN:  Thank you.
(Proceedings were adjourned at 12:08 p.m.)
USA v Fayne         June 25, 2020        Motion to Withdraw
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 5 of 6

    6
 
TRANSCRIBER'S  CERTIFICATION 
I, Judith M. Wolff, a Certified Realtime Reporter,
with offices in Atlanta, Georgia, do hereby certify:
That I transcribed the proceedings digitally recorded
on June 25, 2020, in the matter of USA vs. Maurice Fayne, aka
Arkansas Mo, Case No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC;
That said audio recording of the proceedings were
reduced to typewritten form by me; 
And that the foregoing transcript is a true and
accurate record of the proceedings.
 
Date:  October 16, 2021 
 
 
 
           s/ JUDITH M. WOLFF, CERTIFIED REALTIME REPORTER 
           Signature of Transcriber 
 
USA v Fayne         June 25, 2020        Motion to Withdraw
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 248     Filed 10/22/21     Page 6 of 6

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.248.0.pdf
Size
40,192 bytes
SHA-256
ec074a315a4882534bf26eb3c525a84d1cea0aefe9c9dbf199dd40e0f52301e4
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.248.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top