Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Court filing

Information - United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2021-01-04

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL · Doc. 129-1 · 2021-01-04 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An unsigned proposed order in the criminal case against Maurice Johnson Fayne, No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, filed January 4, 2021 as Document 129-1. The form of order states that the court heard testimony and evidence that the defendant was given a bond condition document with misleading information that did not list all parties the defendant was not to contact. It states that a text message from a probation officer on the same subject did not name a particular person, so contact with that person should be considered legal until added to the do-not-contact list and bond conditions. The order would find in the defendant's favor under 18 U.S.C. s. 3148 (b) (1)& (2) and reinstate the previous bond and the defendant's release until trial or sentencing, with other release conditions remaining in place.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

~~cs O?~C’E~
Ir~j~H~NITED STATES DISTICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
I-I
OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
OF AMERICA
CRIMiNAL CASE
1:20 CR-00228-MHC-JKL
MAURICE JOHNSON FAYNE
A/K/A Arkansas Mo
DEFENDANT
ORDER
That this Court has heard on this date, through testimony and evidence that the
Defendant was provided a Bond condition document with misleading information, not
containing all Parties in which NOT to contact.
The text message from Probation officer Tutor,
relating to the same subject of to whom the Defendant is NOT to contact, DID NOT contain
Jimia Cain’s name. Therefore, any contact with Jimia Cain should be considered legal and
constitutional, until added to list of “DO NOT CONTACT” AND BOND CONDITIONS.
Based on this new evidence and careful review, this Court finds in the Defendants favor
under 18 U.S.C. s. 3148 (b) (1)& (2) and does hereby REINSTATE the previous bond and the
Defendants release until trial/sentencing. All other conditions of release remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED this — day of __________________, 2020.
Judge
V
Date
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 129-1     Filed 01/04/21     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.129.1.pdf
Size
858,264 bytes
SHA-256
694895c52e3bd6ead8d40ee0a003af32d18011d91462ebe0ef1be2d4b11e8db2
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.129.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top