Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. McCabe United States v. Dustin Sean McCabe — S.D. Fla., No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC OMNIBUS ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND ESTABLISHING PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND SENTENCING……

Court filing

OMNIBUS ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND ESTABLISHING PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND SENTENCING… — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 14)

Filed September 24, 2024 in USA v. McCabe; one of 219 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2024-09-24

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC · Doc. 14 · 2024-09-24 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
vs. 
 
DUSTIN SEAN MCCABE, 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
____________________________________/ 
 
OMNIBUS ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND ESTABLISHING PRETRIAL 
INSTRUCTIONS AND SENTENCING PROCEDURES 
 
  This case is hereby set for a Criminal Jury Trial at Alto Lee Adams, Sr. United States 
Courthouse, 101 South U.S. Highway 1, Courtroom 4008, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950, during the 
two-week period commencing November 4, 2024, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called.  
A Calendar Call will be held at 1:45 p.m. on Tuesday, October 29, 2024, at the same location.  Any 
testing of electronic equipment to be used at trial must take place at the Calendar Call.  To that 
end, the parties are directed to bring to the Calendar Call any equipment intended for use at trial.  
All pre-trial motions and motions in limine must be filed by Friday, October 11, 2024.  Each party 
is limited to filing one motion in limine; if there is more than one Defendant, Defendants shall file 
a combined motion unless a clear conflict of position exists, in which case the parties shall explain 
that conflict in their individual motions.  Motions in limine may not, without leave of the Court, 
exceed the page limits allowed by the Rules, and they must state with particularity the evidence at 
issue and the legal and factual basis relevant to disposition of the motion. 
It is further ORDERED as follows: 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 1 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
2 
 
1. All requests for Writs ad Testificandum must be filed no later than 14 business days prior 
to the first day of the scheduled trial period. 
2. In accordance with Local Rule 88.5, the parties shall file speedy trial reports every 
twenty-one (21) days following entry of this Order until the time of trial or plea. 
3. All responses pursuant to the Standing Discovery Order and/or Local Rule 88.10 shall be 
provided in a timely fashion in accordance with the dates scheduled by the magistrate 
judge.  Noncompliance with the Standing Discovery Order, the Local Rules, or the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure may result in sanctions.  Any notice submitted pursuant to 
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) must be filed as a motion—not as a notice—and must 
identify with particularity the evidence to be introduced and the factual and legal 
basis supporting admission.  Responses to such motions are due in accordance with 
the standard timing set forth in Local Rule 7.1(c).   
4. To the extent required by Local Rule 88.9(a), all motions shall be accompanied by a written 
statement certifying that counsel for the moving party has conferred with opposing counsel 
in a good faith effort to resolve by agreement the subject matter of the motion. 
5. Prior to Calendar Call, each party may file on CM/ECF no more than 5 proposed voir 
dire questions (including any sub-parts) for the Court to consider asking of the venire. 
Failure to timely file proposed voir dire questions as set forth in this Order will preclude a 
party’s insistence on requesting such questions be asked by the Court except as 
determined by the Court. The Court will not permit the backstriking of jurors. 
6. Prior to Calendar Call, the parties shall file their proposed jury instructions and verdict 
form, in a single joint filing, on CM/ECF.  In addition to filing the joint jury instructions 
and verdict form on CM/ECF, the parties shall submit that filing, in Word format, via e-
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 2 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
3 
 
mail to cannon@flsd.uscourts.gov, proposed jury instructions, including substantive 
charges and defenses, and a proposed verdict form.  For instructions on filing proposed 
documents, please see http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov.  Although the parties need not 
agree on each proposed instruction, the parties shall submit their proposed jury 
instructions and verdict form jointly, and every instruction must be supported by 
citation to authority.  Where the parties do not agree on a proposed instruction, the 
instruction shall be set forth in bold type.  Instructions proposed only by the Government 
shall be underlined.  Instructions proposed solely by the defense shall be italicized.  
Furthermore, the parties should identify, as to each proposed jury instruction, whether the 
proposed language conforms to the Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions.  If a 
proposed instruction deviates from the Pattern Jury Instructions in any respect, such 
alteration should be made clear in the filing with a supporting explanation.  To access 
the latest changes to the Eleventh Circuit’s Pattern Jury Instructions, please see 
https://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/pattern-jury-instructions.  
7. Prior to Calendar Call, all counsel shall file on CM/ECF lists of proposed witnesses 
and/or exhibits to be presented at trial.  All exhibits to be offered into evidence must be re-
labeled in accordance with the proposed exhibit list.  (Government exhibits are to be 
designated as GX1, GX2, etc.; defense exhibits as DX1, DX2, etc.).  Counsel should 
take care to ensure that exhibits are not compound—that is, that each document, to the 
extent practicable, is identified and marked individually. 
8. Additionally, no later than the first day of trial, the Government shall provide the Court 
with a tabbed binder containing copies of all proposed Government exhibits corresponding 
to the Government’s filed exhibit list. 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 3 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
4 
 
9. Any change of plea must be taken prior to 5:00 p.m. on the last business day before 
trial is scheduled to begin.  See, e.g., United States v. Gamboa, 166 F.3d 1327, 1331 (11th 
Cir. 1999). 
10. Any motion for a continuance of trial shall (1) set forth in detail which factors constitute 
grounds for a continuance; and (2) indicate whether the reasons served by granting the 
continuance outweigh the defendant’s constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial. 
11. The filing by counsel of a “Notice of Unavailability” by motion or otherwise is not 
provided for under the local rules and shall not be presumed to modify or alter the Court’s 
scheduling order. 
12. If any party seeks to introduce transcript(s) at the trial, that party shall exchange those 
transcripts with all counsel prior to Calendar Call.  If a transcript cannot be agreed upon, 
each party shall be prepared to produce its own version for the trier of fact. 
13. All anticipated Jencks Act1 material shall be turned over to defense counsel no later than 
the morning of the first day of trial.  The material shall include a face sheet for defense 
counsel to sign and date, acknowledging receipt.  For purposes of the record, the signed 
face sheet must be filed by the government on CM/ECF no later than seven (7) days after 
the conclusion of the trial. 
14. Upon receipt of this Order, defense counsel shall certify with the Court’s courtroom deputy 
whether the Defendant requires the aid of an interpreter.  The parties are further instructed 
to notify the Court, at least 24 hours prior to any hearings or trial, if an interpreter is 
required. 
 
1 18 U.S.C. § 3500 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 4 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
5 
 
15. Arrangements for appropriate clothing for defendants in custody must be made with the 
Bureau of Prisons at least seven (7) days prior to the scheduled trial date. 
16. Local Rule 7.1(a)(2) requires that certain motions be accompanied by proposed orders; 
such proposed orders must be filed as attachments to the motions.  Furthermore, pursuant 
to the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, proposed orders shall be submitted to the Court 
by e-mail in Word format at cannon@flsd.uscourts.gov.  
17. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3, and consistent with the Eleventh Circuit’s Local Rules and 
Internal Operating Procedures, see 11th Cir. R. 11-3, within ten (10) days of the conclusion 
of a trial or other proceeding, the parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of 
documentary exhibits that the party offered or introduced into evidence, including properly 
labeled photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits.  The parties are reminded to 
review each of the requirements set forth in Local Rule 5.3, including the requirement to 
redact certain information and to certify compliance with Local Rule 5.3. 
18. Should this matter proceed to sentencing, the parties are advised to adhere to the following 
procedures: 
a. If more than thirty (30) minutes is needed for the hearing, counsel shall file a notice 
estimating the amount of time needed for their presentation and the number of 
witnesses to be called no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the sentencing 
hearing. 
b. The Court further orders, consistent with Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of 
Criminal Procedure, that counsel shall file their Objections, if any, to the 
DRAFT PSR within fourteen (14) days after disclosure of the DRAFT PSR.  
The opposing party must file a response no later than seven (7) days thereafter.   
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 5 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
6 
 
c. The Court has discretion not to consider the merits of untimely objections.  
See, e.g., United States v. Edouard, 485 F.3d 1324, 1351 (11th Cir. 2007); Fed. R. 
Crim. P. 32(b)(2) and (i)(1)(D); United States v. Smith, 522 F. App’x 564, 565 (11th 
Cir. 2013); United States v. Remaley, 646 F. App’x 719, 721 (11th Cir. 2016); 
United States v. Dossou, 569 F. App’x 902, 905 (11th Cir. 2014). 
d. The Court further orders that all motions for upward or downward departure and/or 
variance shall be in writing and filed at least ten (10) calendar days before the 
sentencing hearing.  Responses shall be filed at least three (3) before the sentencing 
hearing.  The United States is required to file a written response to any defense 
motion for variance or departure. 
19. Prohibition on Sealing without Court Approval and Notice on Protective Orders: 
Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4(c) and/or any protective order entered 
into in this case, parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal (other than fee 
applications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1)) unless they first seek and obtain 
permission from the Court via a motion for leave to file under seal.  The motion for leave 
shall be filed publicly except in clear cases of security or risk to personal safety.  The 
motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material, the 
proposed duration of the seal request, and the reasons why partial sealing or redaction or 
means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory.  The party seeking 
authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material 
until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave.   Further, all parties are advised that 
mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order 
does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing and does not otherwise 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 6 of 7

 
 
CASE NO. 24-80103-CR-CANNON 
 
7 
 
relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying that request under applicable 
legal principles governing the presumption of public access to criminal proceedings.2  
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, this 24th day of September 
2024. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
_________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
AILEEN M. CANNON 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
cc: 
counsel of record 
 
2 The parties are advised that a protective order is an agreement between parties.  It does not bind 
the Court.  Nor does it displace background legal principles governing the public’s right of access 
under the common law and/or the First Amendment.   
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2024   Page 7 of 7

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.14.0.pdf
Size
209,739 bytes
SHA-256
cf2cc05676551621811d614b6353264e43afeceb9878ab08b9a78b6c96627b22
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.14.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top