Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered.… — USA v. Ebrahimzadeh (Dkt. 15)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts · No. 1:25-cr-10455-RGS · Doc. 15 · 2025-12-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in United States v. David Ebrahimzadeh, No. 1:25-cr-10455-RGS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy and dated December 12, 2025, filed the same day as Doc. 15. Issued under the Due Process Protections Act, Public Law 116-182, it reminds the United States of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, that is, evidence that is material and favorable or tends to cast doubt on the government's case, citing Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). It states that specific categories of such evidence are set out in Local Rule 116.2. The order lists possible consequences of non-compliance, including reversal of a conviction, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions and sanctions.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Criminal Action No. 
1:25−CR−10455−RGS
 USA
v.
DAVID EBRAHIMZADEH
ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 5(f)
 David H. Hennessy U.S.M.J.
    Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Public Law 116−182, 134 Sta. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020) and Rule
 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this court issues the following Order.  The United States is
 reminded of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant[s], that is,
 all evidence that is material and favorable to the defendant[s] or tends to cast doubt on the United States' case,
 as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny.  Specific categories for exculpatory
 evidence that must be provided to the defense are set out in Local Rule 116.2.  The failure to comply with this
 Order may result in consequences including, but not limited to, the reversal of any conviction, the exclusion of
 evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, and/or
 sanctions by the court.
/s/ − David H. Hennessy
Dated:   December 12, 2025
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:25-cr-10455-RGS     Document 15     Filed 12/12/25     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mad.293123.15.0.pdf

Size

17,788 bytes

SHA-256

01115fe3d3a4f1a45fecccfc78af5cb1639fc2a7324f625ef815cfa04b25cb4b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mad.293123.15.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)