Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. RENDON USA v. Rendon — U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Government's Response to Standing Discovery Order — USA v. Rendon (S.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Government's Response to Standing Discovery Order — USA v. Rendon (S.D. Fla.)

Filed February 15, 2023 in USA v. Rendon; one of 83 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2023-02-15

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 1:23-cr-20036-KMM · Doc. 22 · 2023-02-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
CASE NO. 23-CR-20036-MOORE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
vs. 
DANIELA RENDON, 
Defendant, 
_______________________________________/ 
GOVERNMENT=S RESPONSE TO   
THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER 
The United States hereby files this response to the Standing Discovery Order.  This 
response also complies with Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. 
A.
1.
This production includes a recorded statement made by the defendant before 
or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person then known to the 
defendant to be a government agent, at 801_0016.WMA. 
2.
No defendant testified before the Grand Jury.
3.
The defendant’s prior criminal record, if any exists, will be made available
upon receipt by this office.
5.
Books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or
places, within the government’s possession, custody or control, which are
material to the preparation of the defendant’s defense, or which the
government intends to use as evidence at trial to prove its case in chief, or
which were obtained from or belong to the defendant, may be inspected at
a mutually convenient time at:  the Office of the United States Attorney, 99
Northeast 4th Street, Miami, Florida, Suite 606.  Please call the undersigned
to set up a date and time that is convenient to both parties.
The attachments to this discovery response are not necessarily copies of all
the books, papers, documents, data, etc., that the government may intend to
introduce at trial.
6.
There were no physical or mental examinations or scientific tests or
experiments made in connection with this case.
B.
DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY: Pursuant to the Standing
Case 1:23-cr-20036-KMM   Document 22   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023   Page 1 of 3

 
 
2 
Discovery Order, the United States requests the disclosure and production 
of materials listed in Section (b) of Local Rule 88.10.   This request is also 
made pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 
 
C. 
 
The government will disclose any information or material which may be 
favorable on the issues of guilt or punishment within the scope of Brady v. 
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 
(1976). 
 
D. 
 
The government will disclose any payments, promises of immunity, 
leniency, preferential treatment, or other inducements made to prospective 
government witnesses, within the scope of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 
150 (1972), or Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959). 
 
E. 
 
The government will disclose any prior convictions of any alleged co-
conspirator, accomplice or informant who will testify for the government at  
trial. 
 
F. 
 
No defendant was identified in a lineup, show up, photo array or similar 
identification proceedings. 
 
G. 
 
The government has advised its agents and officers involved in this case to 
preserve all rough notes. 
 
H. 
 
The government will timely advise the defendant of its intent, if any, to 
introduce at trial extrinsic act evidence pursuant to F.R.E. 404(b).  Pursuant 
to Local Rule 88.10, the notice will be provided regardless of whether the 
evidence may be used in the case-in-chief, for impeachment or possible 
rebuttal, and will include the general nature of the evidence.   
 
 
 
You are hereby on notice that all evidence made available to you for 
inspection, as well as all statements disclosed herein or in any future 
discovery letter, may be offered in the trial of this cause, under F.R.E. 
404(b) or otherwise (including the inextricably-intertwined doctrine). 
 
I. 
 
The defendant is not an aggrieved person, as defined in Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 2510(11), of any relevant electronic surveillance that 
was authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2516 and 18 U.S.C §2518 and that 
has been unsealed in accordance with 18 U.S.C §2518. 
 
J. 
 
The government has ordered transcribed the Grand Jury testimony of all 
witnesses who will testify for the government at the trial of this cause. 
 
K. 
 
No contraband is involved in this indictment. 
 
L. 
 
The government does not know of any automobile, vessel, or aircraft 
Case 1:23-cr-20036-KMM   Document 22   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023   Page 2 of 3

 
 
3 
allegedly used in the commission of this offense that is in the government's 
possession. 
 
M. 
 
The government is not aware of any latent fingerprints or palm prints which 
have been identified by a government expert as those of the defendant. 
 
N. 
 
The government will make every possible effort in good faith to stipulate to 
all facts or points of law the truth and existence of which is not contested 
and the early resolution of which will expedite trial.  These stipulations will 
be discussed at the discovery conference. 
 
O.  
The government is available for a pretrial discovery conference as required 
by Rule 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Local Rule 
88.10(o).  While the government and defense counsel have already 
discussed a timetable and procedures for pretrial discovery via email, 
should defense counsel wish to discuss these matters further or in person, 
please contact the undersigned with dates that defense counsel is available. 
 
The government is aware of its continuing duty to disclose such newly discovered 
additional information required by the Standing Discovery Order, Rule 16(c) of the Federal Rules 
of Criminal Procedure, Brady, Giglio, Napue, and the obligation to assure a fair trial. 
 
The attachments to this response are numbered 2023_02_14_000001 through 
2023_02_14_011948.   Please contact the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney if any 
portions are missing. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
MARKENZY LAPOINTE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
Jonathan Bailyn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jonathan Bailyn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Court ID No. A5502602 
99 Northeast Fourth Street, 6th Floor 
Miami, Florida 33132-2111 
Phone: (305) 961-9071 
jonathan.bailyn@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 1:23-cr-20036-KMM   Document 22   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023   Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.627608.22.0.pdf
Size
159,232 bytes
SHA-256
0b8e43aa7fb8ffdf83db2db7a2cd98292b6bbe6024d725078a513c741ccde7a2
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.627608.22.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top