Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Tisone USA v. Tisone — U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida Unopposed Motion to Strike 80 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief — USA v. Tisone (Dkt. 87, M.D. Fla. No. 2:22-mj-01043, docketed in No. 2:22-cr-00039)

Court filing

Unopposed Motion to Strike 80 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief — USA v. Tisone (Dkt. 87, M.D. Fla. No. 2:22-mj-01043, docketed in No. 2:22-cr-00039)

Filed February 16, 2023 in USA v. Tisone; one of 73 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2023-02-16

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM · Doc. 87 · 2023-02-16 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
FORT MYERS DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
Case No. 2:22-cr-39-SPC-NPM 
 
 
DANIEL JOSEPH TISONE 
 
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STRIKE PETITION FOR REMISSION (DOC. 80) 
 
 
The United States moves, unopposed, to strike the Bank of Clarke County’s 
Petition for Remission (Doc. 80) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) and 28 C.F.R. § 
9.4(e).  The United States has conferred with Michael R. Sklaire, counsel for Bank of 
Clarke County (the Bank), who has indicated he has no opposition to this motion. In 
support of its motion, the United States submits the following memorandum of law. 
MEMORANDUM OF LAW 
 
On February 13, 2023, following the Court’s entry of an order of forfeiture and 
preliminary order of forfeiture for direct assets that included funds seized from an 
account at the Bank (Doc. 69), the Bank filed a timely “Petition for Remission,” 
seeking the “remission” of the $64,813.43 seized from the account as “both a party 
owner and as a victim of fraud perpetrated by” the defendant.  Doc. 80.  The pleading 
attached a Petition for Remission Form that the Bank had previously submitted to the 
Federal Bureau of Investigations, also seeking remission of these funds in the parallel 
administrative forfeiture proceedings involving these funds. 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 87     Filed 02/16/23     Page 1 of 3 PageID 612

2 
 
 
Title 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) provides the sole means by which third parties can 
litigate their right to property subject to criminal judicial forfeiture.  The statute 
provides the specific criteria that claims must possess in order to be valid. See 21 
U.S.C. § 853(n)(3). In contrast, 28 C.F.R. § 9.4(e) allows persons to petition the 
Attorney General for the return of property already forfeited to the United States.  18 
U.S.C. § 981 states that the “Attorney General shall have sole responsibility for 
disposing of petitions for remission or mitigation with respect to property involved in 
a judicial forfeiture proceeding.”   
 
Because the Bank’s petition did not meet the requirements of 21 U.S.C. 853, 
and appeared, instead, to be a request for remission directed to the Attorney General, 
the United States contacted Mr. Sklaire to clarify the purpose of the filing.  Mr. 
Sklaire confirmed that the Bank is not contesting the forfeiture proceedings.  Rather, 
the Bank intended to file the Petition for Remission for the Attorney General’s 
consideration.  
 
The United States will construe the Bank’s petition filed at Docket 80 as a 
timely submitted Petition for Remission and will forward it to the appropriate 
reviewing authorities.   
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 87     Filed 02/16/23     Page 2 of 3 PageID 613

3 
 
 
Wherefore, the United States asks that the Court strike Docket 80, construing 
it as a Petition for Remission over which the Court lacks jurisdiction. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
Respectfully Submitted, 
 
ROGER B. HANDBERG 
United States Attorney 
 
 
s/Suzanne C. Nebesky                        
SUZANNE C. NEBESKY 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar Number 59377 
400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200 
Tampa, Florida 33602 
(813) 274-6000 – telephone 
E-mail: suzanne.nebesky@usdoj.gov 
 
 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that on February 16, 2023, I electronically filed the 
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which 
will send a notice of electronic filing to counsel of record. 
 
s/Suzanne C. Nebesky                         
SUZANNE C. NEBESKY 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 87     Filed 02/16/23     Page 3 of 3 PageID 614

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.87.0.pdf
Size
80,167 bytes
SHA-256
d189b3bbac6dcd63cb9f68e085ff82d274b0de16b19158efc29515b9c680b60a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.87.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top