Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Tisone USA v. Tisone — U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida Discovery Letter — USA v. Tisone (Dkt. 35.1)

Court filing

Discovery Letter — USA v. Tisone (Dkt. 35.1)

Filed May 5, 2022 in USA v. Tisone; one of 73 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2022-05-05

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM · Doc. 35-1 · 2022-05-05 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

2110  First Street, Suite 3-137 
Fort Myers, Florida 33901 
239/461-2200 
239/461-2219 (Fax) 
 
300 N. Hogan Street, Suite 700 
Jacksonville, Florida 32202 
904/301-6300 
904/301-6310 (Fax) 
 
U.S. Department of Justice 
 
35 SE 1st Avenue, Suite 300 
Ocala, Florida 34471 
352/547-3600 
352/547-3623 (Fax) 
United States Attorney 
Middle District of Florida 
 
Main Office 
400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200 
Tampa, Florida 33602 
813/274-6000 
813/274-6358 (Fax) 
 
400 West Washington Street, Suite 3100 
Orlando, Florida 32801 
407/648-7500 
407/648-7643 (Fax) 
Reply to: Fort Myers, FL 
 
 
 
May 5, 2022 
 
Mark Eiglarsh  
Law Offices of Mark Eiglarsh 
3107 Stirling Road, Suite 207 
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312 
 
 
Re: United States v. Daniel Joseph Tisone    
 
Case No. 2:22-cr-39-SPC-NPM 
 
Dear Mr. Eiglarsh: 
 
 
In connection with the above-captioned case and pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 
16(a) as well as the Court’s Criminal Scheduling Orders, discovery in the above-
captioned case is presently available for copying and inspection. A usb drive, 
containing a courtesy copy of the discovery, will be sent to your office via FedEx 
tomorrow, May 6, 2022.  
 
In connection with the above captioned cases, please be advised of the 
following: 
 
 
1.  With respect to the substance of any oral statement which the government 
intends to offer in evidence at trial made by the defendant before or after arrest in 
response to interrogation by any person then known to the defendant to be a 
government agent, please be advised that the defendant did make such oral 
statements to government agents. The defendant provided a post-Miranda statement 
to the FBI on March 31, 2022, which was video and audio recorded. A copy of this 
recording is available for copying and inspection. Additionally, a courtesy copy will 
also be furnished on the usb drive referenced above.   
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 35-1     Filed 05/05/22     Page 1 of 4 PageID 153

2 
 
 
 
2.  With respect to any relevant written or recorded statements made by the 
defendant, please be advised that the United States is in possession of recorded 
statements made by the defendant. The government is in possession of a video and 
audio post-Miranda statement made by the defendant to the FBI on March 31, 2022. 
The statement is available for copying and inspection, and a courtesy copy of the 
statement will be provided.  
 
 
3.  The prior criminal record of the defendant has been made available as part 
of discovery. 
 
 
4.  As to Rule 16 documents and tangible objects, the government is providing 
the documents which will be used in their case-in-chief in their electronic discovery 
production. Please feel free to contact me or the case agent, FBI Special Agent 
Grace Bruno, if you believe electronic production of such documents is insufficient.  
 
 
5.  There are reports of examinations and tests in connection with this case. 
The defendant’s cellular phone was forensically examined and a Cellebrite report 
was created that contains a detailed summary of the digital contents of the phone. 
The report is available for copying and inspection.  
 
 
6.  At this time, the government does intend to call an expert witness. The 
government intends to call ATF Special Agent and Firearms Expert Noah Williams, 
who would opine that the ammunition the defendant is alleged to have possessed 
was manufactured outside of the State of Florida.   
 
 
7.  Electronic surveillance has not been conducted with respect to this 
investigation. 
 
 
8.  At this time, the government does not intend to introduce evidence 
pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) in its case-in-chief in this matter.  
 
 
9.  Confidential informants did not provide information during the course of 
the investigation. 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 35-1     Filed 05/05/22     Page 2 of 4 PageID 154

3 
 
10.  There is no known conflict of interest in the representation of the 
defendant by attorneys in this case.  Should such a conflict become known to the 
government, counsel for the defendant will be alerted 
 
 
11.  The defendant was not identified by means of photo identification.   
 
 
12.  Evidence was seized as a result of search warrants.   
 
 
 
 
13.  We are aware of continuing discovery obligations pursuant to Fed. R. 
Crim. P. 16(c) and will make you aware of such materials as soon as possible if such 
materials come to our attention.   
 
 
 
13.  Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b), the United States requests the 
following: 
 
 
 
a. 
Books, papers, documents, photographs, tangible objects, or 
copies or portions thereof, which are within the possession, custody, or control of the 
defendant and which the defendant intends to introduce as evidence in chief at the 
trial.  Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A).   
 
 
 
b. 
Any results or reports of physical or mental examinations and of 
scientific tests or experiments made in connection with the particular case, or copies 
thereof, within the possession or control of the defendant, which the defendant 
intends to introduce as evidence in chief at the trial or which were prepared by a 
witness whom the defendant intends to call at the trial when the results or reports 
relate to that witness' testimony.  Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(B). 
 
 
 
c. 
A written summary of testimony that the defendant intends to 
use under Rule 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence as evidence at trial, 
describing the witnesses' opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions and the 
witnesses' qualifications.  Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 (b)(1)(C). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 35-1     Filed 05/05/22     Page 3 of 4 PageID 155

4 
 
 
 
 
If you have any questions concerning any of the foregoing, please do not hesitate to 
contact the undersigned.   
 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
ROGER B. HANDBERG 
 
United States Attorney 
 
 
By:     ___________________________  
 
Trenton J. Reichling  
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 35-1     Filed 05/05/22     Page 4 of 4 PageID 156

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.35.1.pdf
Size
311,517 bytes
SHA-256
5be26a0d6f4da674cf69f590dd421b0f2d123fabdb70aaaf214f43b44c729bff
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.35.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top