Court filing
Memorandum and Order — United States v. Blevins (Dkt. 56, E.D. Tenn.)
Summary
A memorandum and order by United States Magistrate Judge Christopher H. Steger in United States of America v. Daniel Blevins, No. 1:21-cr-00127-001-CEA-CHS, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga, filed February 20, 2026. It records that Blevins appeared on February 11, 2026 under Rule 32.1 on the petition for warrant for offender under supervision (Doc. 52), was advised of his rights. The Court appointed Attorney Michael Henry of Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. The order directs counsel to confer on an appropriate disposition of the petition or request a hearing before Judge Atchley, and grants the government's motion that Blevins be detained without bail pending further order.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed February 20, 2026 in Daniel Blevins; one of 1 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-02-20 |
Cite this document
“Memorandum and Order — United States v. Blevins (Dkt. 56, E.D. Tenn.).”
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, No. 1:21-cr-00127, Doc. 56, filed 2026-02-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-daniel-blevins-tned-101941/2026-02-20-gov-uscourts-tned-101941-56-0-doc-56/
, SHA-256 a98d0c1214402e7741136ab80ea47e3b9506135c7093f14ccdcd399735c48459.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT CHATTANOOGA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) No. 1:21-cr-00127-001-CEA-CHS
)
DANIEL BLEVINS )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DANIEL BLEVINS (“Defendant”) came before the Court for an initial appearance on
February 11, 2026, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on
the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision [Doc. 52] (the "Petition").
After being sworn in due form of law, Defendant was informed of his privilege against
self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment and his right to counsel under the 6th Amendment to
the United States Constitution.
The Court determined Defendant wanted to be represented by an attorney and that he
qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense.
Consequently, the Court APPOINTED Attorney Michael Henry of Federal Defender Services of
Eastern Tennessee, Inc., to represent Defendant.
Defendant was furnished with a copy of the Petition, and had an opportunity to review that
document with his attorney. The Court determined that Defendant was able to read and understand
the Petition with the assistance of his counsel. In addition, AUSA Tammy Combs explained to
Defendant the specific charges contained in the Petition. Defendant acknowledged that he
understood the charges in the Petition.
The Government moved Defendant be detained pending disposition of the Petition or
further Order of this Court. The Court explained Defendant’s right to a preliminary hearing and
detention hearing and what those hearings entail. Defendant conferred with his counsel and
waived the preliminary hearing and the detention hearing.
The Court finds that probable cause exists to demonstrate that Defendant has committed
violations of his conditions of supervised release and that Defendant has not carried the burden
of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to any
other person or to the community. Consequently, the Court GRANTED the Government’s oral
motion to detain Defendant pending disposition of the Petition or further Order of this Court.
1
Case 1:21-cr-00127-CEA-CHS Document 56 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID
#: 317
It is, therefore, ORDERED that:
1. Counsel for Defendant and the Government shall confer and make best
efforts to submit to the Honorable United States District Judge Charles E.
Atchley, Jr., a proposed Agreed Order with respect to an appropriate
disposition of the Petition.
2. In the event counsel are unable to reach agreement with respect to an
appropriate disposition of the Petition, they shall request a hearing before
Judge Atchley.
3. The Government’s motion that Defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT
BAIL pending further Order of this Court is GRANTED.
ENTER.
/s/ Christopher H. Steger
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Case 1:21-cr-00127-CEA-CHS Document 56 Filed 02/20/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID
#: 318File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.tned.101941.56.0.pdf
- Size
- 128,003 bytes
- SHA-256
- a98d0c1214402e7741136ab80ea47e3b9506135c7093f14ccdcd399735c48459
- Original
- archive.org