Court filing
ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to DAMARIS VALERIO Time excluded from 2/1/2025 until… — USA v. VALERIO (Dkt. 20)
Summary
An Order for Continuance in United States v. Damaris Valerio, Mag. No. 23-11198 (Case 2:23-mj-11198-AME), U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed January 29, 2025 as Document 20. On the joint application of the United States Attorney and the defendant, the order continues the case through April 1, 2025, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and excludes that period in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974. It states that the Court has granted seven § 3161(h)(7)(A) continuances previously and finds that the parties have reached a plea agreement and want time to schedule a plea hearing. Form and entry are consented to by Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin D. Bleiberg and John L. Russo, Esq., counsel for the defendant.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-01-29 |
Cite this document
“ORDER TO CONTINUE - Ends of Justice as to DAMARIS VALERIO Time excluded from 2/1/2025 until… — USA v. VALERIO (Dkt. 20).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:23-mj-11198-AME, Doc. 20, filed 2025-01-29. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-damaris-valerio-njd-536453/2025-01-29-gov-uscourts-njd-536453-20-0-doc-20/
, SHA-256 d20da21e6367b73852dbe11d819bf9eed99625e420efa7ea2edf4965f2e9dc32.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 2:23-mj-11198-AME Document 20 Filed 01/29/25 Page 1 of 3 PagelD: 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. André M. Espinosa, U.S.M.J. Vv. : Mag. No. 23-11198 DAMARIS VALERIO, a/k/a “Damaris Tineo Abreu” ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Benjamin D. Bleiberg, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Damaris Valerio (John L. Russo, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) through April 1, 2025. This Court has granted seven § 3161(h)(7)(A) continuances previously in this case. The parties have represented that they have reached a revised plea agreement, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to schedule a plea hearing and have the plea agreement entered in court, which will avoid the need for trial. Counsel for the United States has also represented that this additional continuance is necessary to prevent any more non-excludable days under § 3161(h) from expiring. The defendant knows that she has the right under § 3161(b) to have this matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days after her arrest. Case 2:23-mj-11198-AME Document 20 Filed 01/29/25 Page 2 of 3 PagelD: 48 The defendant, through counsel, has consented to this continuance. FOR GOOD CAUSE, THIS COURT FINDS that this case should be continued for the following reasons: 1. The parties have reached a plea agreement, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to schedule a plea hearing and have the plea agreement entered in court, which will avoid the need for trial. 2. The grant of a continuance will render grand jury proceedings and a trial in this matter unnecessary and will likely conserve judicial resources. 3. Thus, the ends of justice served by granting the continuance and preventing any further non-excludable days from passing under § 3161(h) outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is continued for a period from the date of this order through April 1, 2025; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period from the date of this order through April 1, 2025, shall be excluded in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974; and Case 2:23-mj-11198-AME Document 20 Filed 01/29/25 Page 3 of 3 PagelD: 49 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this Order or the application prompting it is a finding or representation that less than 31 non-excludable days under § 3161(h) have expired. / HONORABLE ANDRE M. ESPINOSA United States District Judge Dated: January 29 2025 Form and entry consented to: Benjamin D. Bleiberg Assistant U.S. Attorney Jokn L. Russo, Esq. ounsel for Defendant
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.536453.20.0.pdf
- Size
- 1,910,903 bytes
- SHA-256
- d20da21e6367b73852dbe11d819bf9eed99625e420efa7ea2edf4965f2e9dc32
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.536453.20.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)