Court filing
ORDER advising of the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory… — USA v. VALERIO (Dkt. 7)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-11-15 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey · No. 2:23-mj-11198-AME · Doc. 7 · 2023-11-15 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
An order under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure entered in United States v. Damaris Valerio, Mag. No. 2:23-mj-11198-AME, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed November 15, 2023 as Doc. 7. The one-page form order confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. It states that the confirmation was made on the record during the defendant's initial appearance in the presence of both the prosecutor and defence counsel. It lists possible consequences of untimely production, including an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings or sanctions. It is signed by André M. Espinosa, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. _______________________, Defendant. Mag No. __________________ ORDER Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this______ day of_____________, 202, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court. Hon. United States Magistrate Judge '1-&55(9 V$1'5e0(63,126$ 23mj11198 DAMARIS VALERIO November 15th André M. Espinosa, USMJ Case 2:23-mj-11198-AME Document 7 Filed 11/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 17
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.536453.7.0.pdf
- Size
- 189,802 bytes
- SHA-256
- f2c2ca04a8c30d7c4117611983b4ca518563923a18d74ff055d49ff5be8607c1
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.536453.7.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)