Court filing
Criminal Complaint — United States v. Carter (Dkt. 20, E.D. Mich. No. 2:22-mj-30125)
Filed October 5, 2022 in Carter; one of 20 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-10-05 |
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
No. 22-mj-30125
-vs-
Java Dominique Carter,
Defendant.
/
GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO ADJOURN PRELIMINARY HEARING
AND FOR DETERMINATION OF EXCLUDABLE DELAY UNDER
THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND SUPPORTING BRIEF
The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys,
move for an adjournment of the preliminary hearing and an ends-of-justice
continuance under the Speedy Trial Act. In support, the government states as
follows:
1.
Defendant was arrested on the criminal complaint in this case on
March 16, 2022 , and he made his initial appearance on the criminal complaint on March
16, 2022. Defendant was released on a $10,000 unsecured bond. The preliminary hearing
is currently scheduled to take place on October 4, 2022
2.
The government and defendant are engaged in preindictment plea
negotiations that may result in a plea agreement which will eliminate the need for
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.70 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 6
- 2 -
this Court to conduct a preliminary hearing. A preindictment plea agreement will
also provide that defendant waive his right to be prosecuted by indictment and thus
eliminate the need for the government to seek an indictment and consume grand
jury resources. In addition, a preindictment plea agreement will also eliminate the
need for a trial.
3.
A part of the plea negotiations involves defense counsel’s assessment of the
government’s case against defendant. This assessment requires that defense
counsel have the reasonable time necessary to adequately review the discovery
provided and/or about to be provided by the government to him and then confer
with defendant.
4.
In light of the above, the government submits that there is good cause to
adjourn the preliminary hearing. Moreover, defendant has consented to this
adjournment, and the adjournment sought is fairly limited. See Fed. R. Crim. P.
5.1(d) (“With the defendant’s consent and upon a showing of good cause – taking
into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases – a
magistrate judge may extend the time limits in Rule 5.1(c) one or more times.”).
5.
In addition, in light of the above, the government submits that the ends of
justice served by a continuance of the 30-day arrest-to-indictment period under the
Speedy Trial Act will outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.71 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 6
- 3 -
a speedy indictment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (“The following periods of delay
shall be excluded in computing the time within which an information or an
indictment must be filed: . . . (7) Any period of delay resulting from a continuance
granted by any judge on his own motion or at the request of the defendant or his
counsel, or at the request of the attorney for the Government, if the judge granted
such continuance on the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by
taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a
speedy [indictment].”). Such a continuance would allow the parties to continue
their preindictment plea negotiations without strict time constraints and pursue an
expeditious and fair resolution of the government’s prosecution of defendant. It
would also likely result in the conservation of judicial and prosecutorial resources
by eliminating the need for a preliminary hearing and in the conservation of grand
jury and prosecutorial resources by eliminating the need for defendant to be
prosecuted by way of a grand jury indictment. And it would also likely result in
the conservation of judicial and prosecutorial resources by eliminating the need for
a trial.
6.
Accordingly, the government requests that this Court find there is good
cause to adjourn the preliminary hearing in this case and order that the preliminary
hearing be adjourned until December 5, 2022 The government also requests that
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.72 Filed 10/05/22 Page 3 of 6
- 4 -
this Court find, based on the information and explanation set forth above, that the
ends of justice served by a continuance of the 30-day Speedy Trial Act arrest-to-
indictment period will outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in
a speedy indictment. The government requests that this ends-of-justice
continuance begin on the date of this motion and continue through December 5,
2022 and that that period be deemed excludable delay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7).
7.
Defense counsel, Vincent Haisha, has reviewed this motion and does not
oppose it.
Respectfully submitted,
Dawn N. Ison
United States Attorney
s/Craig Weier
Craig Weier P33261
Assistant United States Attorney
211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001
Detroit, MI 48226
craig.weier@usdoj.gov
(313) 226-9678
Dated: October 4, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.73 Filed 10/05/22 Page 4 of 6
- 5 -
SOUTHERN DIVISION
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
No. 22-mj-30125
-vs-
Java Dominique Carter,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This matter coming before the Court on the Government’s Motion to
Adjourn Preliminary Hearing and for Determination of Excludable Delay under the
Speedy Trial Act, and defense counsel having indicated that he does not oppose the
motion, for the reasons stated in the government’s motion, the motion is granted.
The Court finds, based on the information and explanation set forth in the
government’s motion, that there is good cause to adjourn the preliminary hearing
in this case and orders that it be adjourned to December 5, 2022. See Fed.R. Crim.
P. 5.1(d).
In addition, for the reasons stated in the government’s motion, the Court
finds, based on the information and explanation set forth in the government’s
motion, that the ends of justice served by a continuance of the 30-day Speedy Trial
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.74 Filed 10/05/22 Page 5 of 6
- 6 -
Act arrest-to-indictment period will outweigh the best interest of the public and the
defendant in a speedy indictment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Accordingly, the
Court grants a continuance until December 5, 2022, and orders that the period from
October 4, 2022 to December 5, 2022 be deemed excludable delay pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
s/JONATHAN J.C. GREY
Jonathan J.C. Grey
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: October 5, 2022
Case 2:22-mj-30125-DUTY ECF No. 20, PageID.75 Filed 10/05/22 Page 6 of 6File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mied.360415.20.0.pdf
- Size
- 182,732 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6dc2188e259a8186bee7690bb2c3c84fb8f59c8d91eec693ef437f51602d1e19
- Original
- PACER (login required)