Scheduling Order: re: 15 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan — Carr v. Kabbage, Inc. (Dkt. 19, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cv-01249)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:22-cv-01249-VMC · Doc. 19 · 2022-07-22 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
Jason Carr, Vicki LeMaster, Edward Ford 
Services LLC, Carlton Morgan¸ 365 Sun 
LLC and Candice Worthy, individually and 
on behalf of all others similarly situated, 
Plaintiffs, 
v.  
Kabbage, Inc. d/b/a K Servicing, 
Defendant. 
         Civil Action  
No.1:22-cv-01249-VMC 
SCHEDULING ORDER 
Upon review of the information contained in the Joint Preliminary Report and 
Discovery Plan ("JPRDP") form completed and filed by the Parties, the Court 
orders that the time limits and schedules set forth therein are adopted. The complete 
Discovery Schedule is outlined below:
EVENT 
DUE DATE 
1. Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery
Plan required by Local Rule 16.2
6/29/2022 
2. Initial Disclosures required by Local
Rule   26.1
6/29/2022 
3. If Needed, Parties Begin Meet and
Confer Process  Regarding Scope of
Initial Document Requests
Within 14-days following the 
Court’s ruling on Defendant’s 
Motion to Dismiss  
Case 1:22-cv-01249-VMC   Document 19   Filed 07/22/22   Page 1 of 2

2 
4. If Needed, Parties File Joint
Proposed ESI Protocol and
Stipulated Protective Order
Within 14-days following the 
Court’s ruling on Defendant’s 
Motion to Dismiss  
5. Beginning of Discovery pursuant to L.R.
26.2(A)
30 days after Defendant files 
answer 
6. Parties shall identify their initial experts
and serve their initial expert written
report(s) in accordance with F. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2)(B)
Six months after the beginning of 
fact discovery  
7. Parties shall identify any rebuttal and/or
reply expert written reports in accordance
with F. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)
Forty-five (45) after initial expert 
report 
8. Discovery Closes
Eight months after beginning of 
fact discovery 
11. L.R. 16.3 Conference
Two weeks after close of discovery 
12. Plaintiffs’ file Class Certification Motion
along with Class Certification Expert
Declarations in Support
Six weeks after Rule 16.3 
Conference 
13. Defendant files any Opposition to
Plaintiffs’ Class Certification  Motion along
with any Expert Declarations in Support
Forty-five (45) days after service of  
Plaintiffs’ motion 
14. Plaintiffs file any Reply in Support of
Motion for Class Certification. [Plaintiffs
may also file any Rebuttal Expert
Declarations in Support.]
Twenty-one (21) days after service 
of  Defendants’ opposition 
15. If Needed, Parties Meet and Confer and
Propose a Case Schedule to the Court for
Any Remaining Case Activities
Within 14 days following the 
Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion 
for Class Certification 
So ORDERED, this 22nd day of July,  2022.
_______________________
Victoria M. Calvert 
United States District Judge 
Northern District of Georgia 
Case 1:22-cv-01249-VMC   Document 19   Filed 07/22/22   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.301616.19.0.pdf

Size

156,484 bytes

SHA-256

f6197bc5c3fbb118335cda497f23ef5c038aa847dc038f933844873266101f1f

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.301616.19.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)