Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Vazquez — U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida Government's Response to the Standing Discovery Order

Court filing

Government's Response to the Standing Discovery Order

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2021-05-10

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 1:21-cr-20231-DMM · Doc. 23 · 2021-05-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

The government's response to the Standing Discovery Order in United States v. Carlos Vazquez, No. 1:21-cr-20231-DMM, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered May 10, 2021 as Document 23. Filed under Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, it answers the standard discovery items, stating for example that no defendant testified before the Grand Jury, no contraband is involved, and no lineup identification occurred. It demands reciprocal discovery under Rule 16(b) and commits to disclosures under Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States and F.R.E. 404(b). The response states the attachments are numbered USA_000001-USA_001310. It is signed by Assistant United States Attorney Hayden P. O'Byrne and includes a certificate of service on defense counsel Carlos M. Fleites.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 21-CR-20231-DMM 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
vs. 
 
CARLOS VAZQUEZ, 
 
 
Defendant. 
_______________________________________/ 
 
GOVERNMENT=S RESPONSE TO   
THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER 
 
 
The United States hereby files this response to the Standing Discovery Order.  This 
response also complies with Local Rule 88.10 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. 
A. 
1. 
Attached, please find a copy of any written statements made by the 
defendant(s). 
 
2. 
The government is unaware of any relevant oral statements made by the 
defendant before or after arrest in response to interrogation by any person 
then known to the defendant to be a government agent that the government 
intends to use at trial. 
 
3. 
No defendant testified before the Grand Jury. 
 
4. 
The defendant’s prior criminal record is attached. 
 
5. 
Books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or 
places, within the government’s possession, custody or control, which are 
material to the preparation of the defendant’s defense, or which the 
government intends to use as evidence at trial to prove its case in chief, or 
which were obtained from or belong to the defendant, may be inspected at 
a mutually convenient time at:  the Office of the United States Attorney, 99 
Northeast 4th Street, Miami, Florida,  Sixth Floor. 
 
The attachments to this discovery response are not necessarily copies of all 
the books, papers, documents, data, etc., that the government may intend to 
introduce at trial.  
Case 1:21-cr-20231-DMM   Document 23   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021   Page 1 of 5

 
 
2 
 
6. 
There were no physical or mental examinations or scientific tests or 
experiments made in connection with this case. 
 
B. 
 
DEMAND FOR RECIPROCAL DISCOVERY: Pursuant to the Standing 
Discovery Order, the United States requests the disclosure and production 
of materials listed in Section (b) of Local Rule 88.10.   This request is also 
made pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 
 
C. 
 
The government will disclose any information or material which may be 
favorable on the issues of guilt or punishment within the scope of Brady v. 
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 
(1976). 
 
D. 
 
The government will disclose any payments, promises of immunity, 
leniency, preferential treatment, or other inducements made to prospective 
government witnesses, within the scope of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 
150 (1972), or Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959). 
 
E. 
 
The government will disclose any prior convictions of any alleged co-
conspirator, accomplice or informant who will testify for the government at  
trial. 
 
F. 
 
No defendant was identified in a lineup, show up, photo array or similar 
identification proceedings. 
 
G. 
 
The government has advised its agents and officers involved in this case to 
preserve all rough notes. 
 
H. 
 
The government will timely advise the defendant of its intent, if any, to 
introduce at trial extrinsic act evidence pursuant to F.R.E. 404(b).  Pursuant 
to Local Rule 88.10, the notice will be provided regardless of whether the 
evidence may be used in the case-in-chief, for impeachment or possible 
rebuttal, and will include the general nature of the evidence.   
 
 
 
You are hereby on notice that all evidence made available to you for 
inspection, as well as all statements disclosed herein or in any future 
discovery letter, may be offered in the trial of this cause, under F.R.E. 
404(b) or otherwise (including the inextricably-intertwined doctrine). 
 
In addition, the government may introduce under Rule 404(b) evidence 
underlying the defendant's past criminal activity that has resulted in arrests 
and/or convictions and which is summarized in the attached court 
documents.  
Case 1:21-cr-20231-DMM   Document 23   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021   Page 2 of 5

 
 
3 
 
I. 
 
The defendant is not an aggrieved person, as defined in Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 2510(11), of any relevant electronic surveillance that 
was authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2516 and 18 U.S.C §2518 and that 
has been unsealed in accordance with 18 U.S.C §2518. 
 
J. 
 
The government has ordered transcribed the Grand Jury testimony of all 
witnesses who will testify for the government at the trial of this cause. 
 
K. 
 
No contraband is involved in this indictment. 
 
L. 
 
The government does not know of any automobile, vessel, or aircraft 
allegedly used in the commission of this offense that is in the government's 
possession. 
 
M. 
 
The government is not aware of any latent fingerprints or palm prints which 
have been identified by a government expert as those of the defendant. 
 
N. 
 
The government will make every possible effort in good faith to stipulate to 
all facts or points of law the truth and existence of which is not contested 
and the early resolution of which will expedite trial.  These stipulations will 
be discussed at the discovery conference. 
 
O.  
The government is available for a pretrial discovery conference as required 
by Rule 16.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Local Rule 
88.10(o).  While the government and defense counsel have already 
discussed a timetable and procedures for pretrial discovery via email, 
should defense counsel wish to discuss these matters further or in person, 
please contact the undersigned with dates that defense counsel is available. 
 
The government is aware of its continuing duty to disclose such newly discovered 
additional information required by the Standing Discovery Order, Rule 16(c) of the Federal Rules 
of Criminal Procedure, Brady, Giglio, Napue, and the obligation to assure a fair trial. 
 
 
Case 1:21-cr-20231-DMM   Document 23   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021   Page 3 of 5

 
 
4 
 
The attachments to this response are numbered USA_000001-USA_001310.  Please note 
that the file names of certain spreadsheets were the maximum allowable length, accordingly, bates 
numbers were not added to spreadsheets.  Please contact the undersigned Assistant United States 
Attorney if any portions of this production are missing. 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
By: 
/s/ Hayden P. O’Byrne                                                  
Hayden P. O’Byrne 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 60024 
United States Attorney’s Office - SDFL 
99 Northeast 4th Street 
Miami, FL. 33132-2111 
Tel: (305) 961-9447 
Hayden.obyrne@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 1:21-cr-20231-DMM   Document 23   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021   Page 4 of 5

 
 
5 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 10, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document 
with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.  I also certify that I caused the foregoing document to 
be served this day on all counsel of record on the Service List below in the manner specified. 
 
 
/s/ Hayden P. O’Byrne_____________     
Hayden P. O’Byrne 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
 
SERVICE LIST 
 
Party 
Counsel 
Manner of Service 
Carlos Vazquez 
Carlos M. Fleites 
Law Offices of Carlos M Fleites 
1800 SW 27th Ave, Suite 500 
Miami, Florida 33145 
CM/ECF without 
attachments.    
U.S. Mail with 
attachments. 
 
 
 
Case 1:21-cr-20231-DMM   Document 23   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2021   Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.591071.23.0.pdf
Size
136,651 bytes
SHA-256
bfbe004d257cc8031a0c9a6ba808eee2c496fe372a80f7c7807f3fb0300e6477
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.591071.23.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top