ORDER Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act as to Carl Delano Torjagbo — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 12)

Summary

Magistrate's Criminal Minutes on an arraignment with an order under the Due Process Protections Act, Document 12, filed 05/12/22 in United States v. Carl Delano Torjagbo, Case No. 1:22-CR-171-MLB (N.D. Ga.), with Linda T. Walker presiding as magistrate. The marked boxes show an initial appearance, appointment of the Federal Defender Program as counsel, a plea of not guilty, and assignment to Judge Michael L. Brown and Magistrate Regina D. Cannon. The government's motion for detention is marked granted, with a written order to follow. The final page orders the United States to disclose all exculpatory evidence and warns of consequences for failing to do so.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

MAGISTRATE'S CRIMINAL MINUTES
ARRAIGNMENT
PLEA AND
SENTENCE
Filed in Open Court: Date: 05/12/2022 Time: 2:48 PM
Time in Court:
Tape: FTR GOLD
Hrs
1:49 Min
Magistrate (presiding): LINDA T. WALKER
Case Number: 1:22-CR-171-MLB
AUSA: Russell Phillips
USPO/PTR: Johnny Alexander
Deputy Clerk: Sonya Coqqins
Defendant's Name: Carl Delano Torjagbo
Defendant's Attorney: Kendal Silas
Type Counsel: () Retained () CJA (X ) FPD () Waived
ARREST DATE:
INTERPRETER:
X INITIAL APPEARANCE HEARING. (X ) In THIS DISTRICT
Dft in custody? (X ) Yes () No
X Defendant advised of right to counsel. () WAIVER OF COUNSEL filed.
X ORDER appointing Federal Defender Program as counsel. () INITIAL APPEARANCE ONLY.
ORDER appointing
ORDER giving defendant
as counsel.
days to employ counsel (ec: served by Mag CRD)
Dft to pay attorney fees as follows:
INFORMATION/COMPLAINT filed.
WAIVER OF INDICTMENT filed.
X Copy indictment/information given to dft? (X ) Yes () No Read to dft? () Yes () No (X ) Prior to Hrg
CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE MAGISTRATE (Misd / Petty) offense filed.
X ARRAIGNMENT HELD.( ) Superseding indictment / information
Arraignment continued to
at
( ) Dft's WAIVER of appearance filed.
Request of ( ) Govt ( ) Dft
Dft failed to appear for arraignment.
Bench warrant
issued
X Dft enters PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. () Dft stood mute; plea of NOT GUILTY entered. () Waiver of appearance.
MOTION TO CHANGE PLEA, and order allowing same.
X ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MICHAEL L. BROWN for (X ) trial () arraignmenbfsentence.
X ASSIGNED TO MAGISTRATE Regina D. Cannon for pretrial proceedings.
X Estimated trial time:
days.
()SHORT
(X) MEDIUM
LONG
PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION filed. Referred to USPO for PSI and continued
until at for sentencing.
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 12     Filed 05/12/22     Page 1 of 3

ARRAIGNMENT - Pg. 2 Case No.:
Defendant:
X Government MOTION FOR DETENTION filed. Hearing set for at
Temporary commitment issued.
BOND/PRETRIAL DETENTION HEARING
X BOND / PRETRIAL DETENTION hearing held.
X Government MOTION FOR DETENTION ( X)GRANTED ( ) DENIED ( ) WITHDRAWN
X WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.
HEARING HELD on motion for reduction / modification of bond.
Motion for reduction / modification of Bond ( ) GRANTED () DENIED.
WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.
BOND SET at
Non-surety
Surety ( ) Cash ( ) Property ( ) Corporate surety ONLY
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Bond filed; defendant released.
Bond NOT EXECUTED. Defendant to remain in Marshal's custody.
WITNESSES:
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 12     Filed 05/12/22     Page 2 of 3

ARRAIGNMENT - Pg. 2 Case No.:
Defendant:
MISC: MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' obligation to
disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence- that is, evidence that favors the defendant or casts
doubt on the United States' case, as required by Bradyv. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny,
and ORDERS the United States to do so. The government has a duty to disclose any evidence that
goes to negating the defendant's guilt, the credibility of a witness, or that would reduce a potential
sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory
evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or
sanctions by
the Court.
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 12     Filed 05/12/22     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.303267.12.0.pdf

Size

1,036,474 bytes

SHA-256

474b6d5fd9d1ed6568798aa48e3da6a645fb9dfc53da99f3691b2dd471251380

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.303267.12.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)