Court filing
NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff USA as to Defendant… — USA v. Western Distribution, LLC. et al (Dkt. 25)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-07-21 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 5:21-cr-00170-JGB · Doc. 25 · 2021-07-21 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
A notice to the court of a related criminal case, filed by the United States under General Order 14-03 in United States of America v. Western Distribution, LLC, and Carl Bradley Johansson, Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed July 21, 2021 as Document 25. The notice informs the Court that the case may be related to United States v. National Distribution Services, Inc., et al., CR 18-114(B)-VAP, marked on the form as previously assigned to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips. It checks the boxes for cases arising out of the same conspiracy, common scheme, transaction or series of transactions, and for cases involving one or more defendants in common that would entail substantial duplication of labor. It is dated July 20, 2021 and signed by an Assistant United States Attorney.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF
v.
WESTERN DISTRIBUTION, LLC, and
CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON
DEFENDANTS
CASE NUMBER
CR
NOTICE TO COURT OF
RELATED CRIMINAL CASE
(PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03)
Plaintiff United States of America hereby informs the Court that the above-entitled
criminal case may be related to:
United States v. National Distribution Services, Inc., et al., CR 18-114(B)-VAP,
which:
X
was previously assigned to the Honorable Virginia A. Phillips;
has not been previously assigned.
The above-entitled cases may be related for the following reasons:
X
the cases arise out of the same conspiracy, common scheme, transaction,
series of transactions or events;
X
the cases involve one or more defendants in common and would entail
substantial duplication of labor in pretrial, trial or sentencing proceedings if
heard by different judges.
Additional explanation (if any):
Dated: July 20, 2021
MATTHEW W. O’BRIEN
Assistant United States Attorney
5:21-cr-00170-JFW
07/21/2021
DM
Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 25 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:117
FILED
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BY: ___________________ DEPUTYFile and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.826563.25.0.pdf
- Size
- 131,645 bytes
- SHA-256
- e0b07547716d1f7c4b2d9461d8ffdba08e124ce6397ea60704575a1ab249daf7
- Original
- PACER (login required)