Court filing
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Lajuana M.… — USA v. Golden-Larimore et al (Dkt. 2)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-04-26 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · No. 4:23-cr-00098-BCW · Doc. 2 · 2023-04-26 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
An order of reference to a United States magistrate judge in United States v. Renetta Golden-Larimore, et al., No. 4:23-cr-00098-BCW, in the Western District of Missouri, filed April 26, 2023 as Document 2. Under Section 636(b), Title 28, United States Code and Rule 72.1 of the local rules, it designates United States Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts to hear and determine all pretrial motions, except a motion to dismiss or quash the indictment and a motion to suppress evidence, which are referred to her to hear and process. A party may appeal a determination or object to proposed findings within fourteen days, and the district judge will set aside any portion found clearly erroneous. It also allows the magistrate judge to reassign referred motions and, with the parties' consent, to conduct guilty plea proceedings. The order is signed by District Judge Stephen R. Bough.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
Plaintiff
)
)
vs.
)
Criminal No.
)
)
Defendant(s)
)
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The filed in the above-styled case was filed in the Western District of
Missouri on the day of
, and assigned to the undersigned United States
District Judge.
Pursuant to Section 636(b), Title 28, United States Code, and Rule 72.1 of the Local
Rules for the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, it is
ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge is designated to hear
and determine all pretrial motions or matters now pending or later filed, except (1) a motion to
dismiss or quash the indictment, and (2) a motion to suppress evidence, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 636(b)(1)(A), Title 28, United States Code; and such pretrial motions or
matters now pending or later filed in this criminal action are referred to the Magistrate Judge to
hear and determine.
Any party may appeal from the Magistrate Judge’s order determining a motion within
fourteen (14) days after issuance of the order unless a different time is prescribed by the
Magistrate Judge or the undersigned District Judge. Such party shall file with the Clerk
WESTERN DIVISION
23-00098-01/12-CR-W-SRB
RENETTA GOLDEN-LARIMORE, et al
Indictment
26th
April
2023
Lajuana M. Counts
Case 4:23-cr-00098-BCW Document 2 Filed 04/26/23 Page 1 of 3
of Court, and serve the Magistrate Judge and all parties, a written statement of the appeal which
shall specifically designate the order, or part thereof, appealed from and the basis for the appeal.
The undersigned District Judge will consider the appeal and set aside any portion of the
Magistrate Judge’s order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The undersigned
District Judge may reconsider sua sponte any motion determined by the Magistrate Judge. It is
further
ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge is designated to hear
and process all pretrial motions to (1) dismiss or quash the indictment, and (2) suppress evidence,
now pending or later filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 636(b)(1)(B) and
(b)(1)(C), Title 28, United States Code; and all such pretrial motions now pending or later filed
are referred to the Magistrate Judge to hear and process. Any party may object to the Magistrate
Judge’s proposed finding and recommendations in respect to (1) a motion to dismiss or quash the
indictment, or (2) a motion to suppress evidence, within fourteen (14) days after being served
with a copy of the proposed findings and recommendations. Such party shall file with the Clerk
of Court, and serve the Magistrate Judge and all parties, written objections which shall
specifically identify the portion or portions of the proposed findings and recommendations to
which an objection is made and the basis for each objection.
The undersigned District Judge will make a de novo determination of those portions of
the proposed findings and recommendations to which specific objections is made and may
accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the proposed findings or recommendations made by
the Magistrate Judge. The undersigned District Judge need not conduct a new hearing and may
consider only the record developed before the Magistrate Judge in making his de novo
Lajuana M. Counts
Case 4:23-cr-00098-BCW Document 2 Filed 04/26/23 Page 2 of 3
determination. The undersigned District Judge may receive further evidence, recall witnesses, or
recommit the motion to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. It is further
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge may, in his/her discretion, reassign any motions
referred to him/her pursuant to this order, to another Magistrate Judge for processing and
handling. In the event of such a reassignment, the Magistrate Judge to whom the motion is
reassigned is designated to hear and determine or hear and process the motion in accordance
with the provisions of this order.
It is further
ORDERED with the consent of the parties, if directed by the undersigned District Judge,
the Magistrate Judge may conduct guilty plea proceedings and make a recommendation to the
District Judge.
_____________________________________
United States District Judge
, Missouri
Dated:
s/ Stephen R. Bough
Kansas City, Missouri
4/26/2023
Case 4:23-cr-00098-BCW Document 2 Filed 04/26/23 Page 3 of 3File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mowd.169316.2.0.pdf
- Size
- 321,722 bytes
- SHA-256
- 4f579ce02887b5d4b3c37d25def8b3e1c1e450a2dafd50944ba428d29e1e6333
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mowd.169316.2.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)