BRADY ORDER as to BUTHERDE DARIUS — USA v. DARIUS (Dkt. 6, No. 3:22-cr-00783-GC, filed 2022-01-27)

Summary

A one-page Brady order in United States of America v. Butherde Darius, filed 01/27/22 as Document 6 under Case 3:22-cr-00783-GC in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; the caption also prints 22-10018. Citing Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the defendant's initial appearance on January 27, 2022, the Court confirms the government's continuing obligation under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States to disclose information favorable to the defense, including information that may cast doubt on the credibility of government witnesses. Violations may lead to exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges or contempt proceedings. The order bears the signature of the United States Magistrate Judge (s/Michael A. Hammer).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 3:22-cr-00783-GC Document6 Filed 01/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PagelD: 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

22-10018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.
V. ORDER
BUTHERDE DARIUS
Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 27th day of January

2022, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation, pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83
(1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and subsequent cases, to timely disclose
information favorable to the defense as to criminal liability on the charged offense(s) or
mitigation of any punishment that may be imposed. Such favorable information includes
information that may cast doubt on the credibility of government witnesses. Possible
consequences for violating this order include exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges,

contempt proceedings, disciplinary referral, and any other relief authorized by law.

s/Michael A. Hammer

Hon. Michael A. Hammer
United States Magistrate Judge


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.njd.504842.6.0.pdf

Size

155,209 bytes

SHA-256

8f7b43437c6b5124308cd91b45a8acb1e6abdf76f81e9971f60d89417ffd18c4

Our copy

gov.uscourts.njd.504842.6.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)