Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 244.1)

Summary

Document 244-1, filed 09/05/24 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC (Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, N.D. Cal.), is a [PROPOSED] Order re Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed (Doc. 239), submitted by Perkins Coie LLP for Hon. Edward M. Chen. As drafted, the Court would find compelling reasons to seal listed portions of Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement (Doc. 241) and of the Declaration of Andre Mura and Geoffrey Graber (Doc. 241-1), including part of Exhibit 2. The order cites Thomson Reuters' Statement in Response and the Declaration of Kevin Appold. The sealed words are not shown and the date line for the judge is blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 244-1     Filed 09/05/24    Page 1 of 3



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567              Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                     GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                       3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                     Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                          Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                 Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      PERKINS COIE LLP                               Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                  HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                         PERKINS COIE LLP
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                        500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                        Dallas, TX 75201-3347
                                                     Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Attorneys for Defendant                        Facsimile: 214.965.7799
      Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12                                 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13

14   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
     SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15   all others similarly situated,              [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
16                         Plaintiffs,           CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
                                                 PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
17          v.                                   SEALED

18   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,

19                         Defendant.

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                                                [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 244-1        Filed 09/05/24      Page 2 of 3



 1                                       [PROPOSED] ORDER

 2          The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Moton to Consider Whether

 3   Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed (Doc. 239), Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Statement

 4   in Response and all supporting materials, including the Declaration of Kevin Appold, finds that

 5   compelling reasons exist to seal the following portions of Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion

 6   for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement (Doc. 241) and Declaration of Andre Mura and

 7   Geoffrey Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement

 8   (Doc. 241-1):

 9

10              Cite                                     Portion(s) to Seal

11      Doc. 241              Page 19, line 17 (between “period, is” and end of sentence)
        Motion (19:17)
12
        Doc. 241              Page 26, line 21 (between “approximately” and “of”)
13
        Motion (26:21)
14
        Doc. 241              Page 26, fn. 14 (between “is” and “%,” between “of” and end of first
15      Motion (26 fn. 14)    sentence, and between “approximately” and “%” )

16      Doc. 241-1            Page 1, line 24 (everything after “First,”) through Page 2, line 8
        Decl. (1:24–2:8)      (everything before “Second,”)
17
        Doc. 241-1            Page 5, line 11 (between “be” and end of sentence)
18      Decl. (5:11)
19      Doc. 241-1            Final page of Exhibit 2 (ECF Page 43), far right column, second row
        Decl. Ex. 2.          from bottom.
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                    -2-                              [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 244-1    Filed 09/05/24   Page 3 of 3



 1   IT IS SO ORDERED.

 2

 3    DATED: ____________________                    __________________________________
                                                     Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
 4                                                   United States District Judge
 5

 6   Submitted by:

 7   PERKINS COIE LLP
 8

 9   By: /s/ Hayden Schottlaender
     Hayden Schottlaender
10
     Attorneys for Defendant
11   Thomson Reuters Corporation
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                -3-                          [PROPOSED] ORDER


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.244.1.pdf

Size

164,026 bytes

SHA-256

e33a205211e5d82b883e487c7693647d6c1b01a7f90ff9d4e456972f6d6ac130

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.244.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)