Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 239.4)

Summary

Document 239-4, filed 08/29/24 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, is a three-page [Proposed] Order Re: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed. The form of order recites that it follows consideration of that motion, which relates to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, under Local Rule 79-5. It would allow listed portions of the Motion and of the Mura and Graber declaration, including Exhibit 2, to be filed under seal. A table names Defendant as the designating party for each listed portion, and the order closes with a date line and signature line for Edward M. Chen.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

         Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 239-4   Filed 08/29/24   Page 1 of 3




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
10                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                              SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,            Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others
13
     similarly situated,                        [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’
14                                              ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
                               Plaintiffs,      CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
15                                              PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
           v.
16                                              SEALED
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
17                                              Hon. Edward M. Chen
18                           Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 239-4        Filed 08/29/24   Page 2 of 3




 1          Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another
 2   Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed, relating to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval
 3   of Class Action Settlement (“Motion”), materials in support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative
 4   Motion, and any responses from the designating party, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5;
 5         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
 6          The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion and supporting documents may be filed
 7   under seal:
 8    Portion of Motion or Portion of Material               Designating       Ruling
      Supporting Motion                                      Party
 9
      Motion, page 19, line 17 (between “period, is” and     Defendant
10    end of sentence”)
      Motion,     page     26,    line   21     (between     Defendant
11
      “approximately” and “of Plaintiffs’ maximum
12    recovery”)
      Motion, page 26, line 26 (between “$27,500,000 is”     Defendant
13
      and “% of”)
14    Motion, page 26, line 26 (between “% of” and end       Defendant
      of sentence)
15
      Motion,     page     26,    line   28     (between     Defendant
16    “approximately” and end of sentence)
      Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
17
      Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
18    Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
      Page 1 line 24 to Page 2 line 8 (between “First,”
19    and end of sentence)
20    Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
      Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
21    Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
22    Page 5, line 11 (between “to be” and end of
      sentence)
23    Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
24    Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
      Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
25    Exhibit 2, Comparator Table, second from the
26    bottom row of table, far right cell (entire cell for
      the row “Total Potential Exposure” and column
27    “This Settlement”)
28
                                            1
       [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
             WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
         Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC      Document 239-4   Filed 08/29/24   Page 3 of 3




 1
     IT IS SO ORDERED.
 2
 3
     DATED: ______________________             ___________________________
 4
                                               EDWARD M. CHEN
 5                                             United States District Judge

 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                           2
      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.239.4.pdf

Size

159,219 bytes

SHA-256

08dda98800677ced8119bf4b763e5c001ddb1de89229228377bd35e93f8e66d5

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.239.4.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)