Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 206 Order on Motion for… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters…

Court filing

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 206 Order on Motion for… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 208)

Summary

Document 208, filed 05/23/23 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC (Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, N.D. Cal.), is a Joint Sealing Request and [Proposed] Order re Court Order dated May 16, 2023 (ECF No. 206), submitted by Thomson Reuters and Plaintiffs and dated May 23, 2023. The parties say good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal listed portions of the May 16 Order because they reveal financial information about the CLEAR platform, the proportion of CLEAR searches run using various fields, and the makeup of CLEAR customers and data. They say disclosure would harm Thomson Reuters by letting competitors learn how it positioned CLEAR, that the Court already sealed this information in prior filings (Dkts. 179, 188), and that Plaintiffs do not oppose. A table lists the passages by page and line.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 206 Order on Motion for… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 208).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 208. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-05-23-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-208-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-208-0/, SHA-256 db2d7644c66d4772d3bacfb72d8e63a7806a2f171b594f3a4bc38448956fdade.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 208     Filed 05/23/23    Page 1 of 5



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567              Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                     GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                       3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                     Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                          Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                 Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      Tyler S. Roberts, pro hac vice                 Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    TRoberts@perkinscoie.com                       HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Kayla Lindgren, Bar No. 339416                 PERKINS COIE LLP
      KLindgren@perkinscoie.com                      500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    PERKINS COIE LLP                               Dallas, TX 75201-3347
      1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                  Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                         Facsimile: 214.965.7799
      Telephone: 206.359.8000
10
      Facsimile: 206.359.9000
11
      Attorneys for Defendant
12    Thomson Reuters Corporation

13                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14                            NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                                   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15

16
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                         Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
17   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
     all others similarly situated,                 JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
18                                                  [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                           Plaintiffs,              DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)
19
            v.
20
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
21
                           Defendant.
22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                                     JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
                                                              [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                                                                  DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC           Document 208         Filed 05/23/23       Page 2 of 5



 1                      JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

 2          The Parties submit this joint sealing request and proposed order pursuant to the Court’s

 3   Order dated May 16, 2023 (ECF No. 206). Good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal the

 4   following portions of the Court’s Order dated May 16, 2023, because they reveal financial

 5   information related to the CLEAR platform, confidential information about the proportion of

 6   CLEAR searches run using various fields, and confidential information about the makeup of

 7   CLEAR customers and CLEAR data that is not already public. Revealing this information publicly

 8   would harm Thomson Reuters by allowing competitors to learn how Thomson Reuters has

 9   positioned CLEAR in the marketplace and could give rise to a misleading or inaccurate picture of

10   CLEAR and related business practices. The Court has already sealed this information in prior

11   filings. See Dkts. 179, 188. Plaintiffs do not oppose sealing of these materials.

12

13         ECF No. 206                                     Portion(s) to Seal

14      Order (3:5)            Page 3, line 5 (after “calculated as approximately” and before
                               million.”)
15
        Order (3:9)            Page 3, line 9 (after “Dr. Lloyd determines that” and before “of
16
                               Reuters’ revenue from CLEAR is from recurring”)
17
        Order (3:11)           Page 3, line 11 (after “searches) and” and before “is from
18                             transactional revenue (per-search charges) from the years between
                               2017”)
19
        Order (3:16)           Page 3, line 16 (after “determined that the” and before “was made in
20                             2017,”)
21      Order (3:16)           Page 3, line 16 (after “was made in 2017,”and before “in 2018,”)

22      Order (3:16)           Page 3, line 16 (after “in 2018,” and before “in 2019,”)

23      Order (3:16)           Page 3, line 16 (after “in 2019,” to end of line 16)

24      Order (3:17)           Page 3, line 17 (after “in 2020, and” and before “in 2021.”)

25      Order (3:26)           Page 3, line 26 (after “about natural persons in the CLEAR database,
                               he determined that” and before “of that California revenue”)
26
        Order (4:4.5)          Page 4, line 4.5 (after “the data indicates that approximately” and
27                             before “of all CLEAR searches”)
28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                      -2-                 JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
                                                                   [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                                                                       DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 208         Filed 05/23/23       Page 3 of 5



 1
           ECF No. 206                                   Portion(s) to Seal
 2
        Order (4:11)          Page 4, line 11 (after “Californians’ personal information was” and
 3                            before “resulting in a”)
 4      Order (4:11)          Page 4, line 11 (after “resulting in a” and before “profit margin.”)
 5      Order (7:1)           Page 7, line 1 (after “and” and before “natural person proportions that
                              he used in his calculation of revenue.”)
 6
        Order (7:22)          Page 7, line 22 (after “Based on the fact that “about” and before “of”)
 7
        Order (7:23)          Page 7, line 23 (after “CLEAR’s current customers are corporate
 8                            users” and the other” and before “are governmental entities,”)
 9      Order (7:26)          Page 7, line 26 (after “average these metrics based on the data that
10                            about” and before “the customers are governmental entities”)

11      Order (7:27)          Page 7, line 27 (after “and” and before “are corporate users.”)

12      Order (8:1)           Page 8, line 1 (beginning of line 1 and before “were for California.”)

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                    -3-                 JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
                                                                 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                                                                     DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 208          Filed 05/23/23      Page 4 of 5



 1
     DATED: May 23, 2023                                  PERKINS COIE LLP
 2

 3                                                        By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
                                                              Anna Mouw Thompson, pro hac vice
 4                                                            AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
 5                                                        Attorneys for Defendant
                                                          Thomson Reuters Corporation
 6

 7   DATED: May 23, 2023                              By: /s/ Andre M. Mura
                                                           Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
 8
                                                           amm@classlawgroup.com
 9

10
         Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)                        Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
11       Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)                        Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
         Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)                         COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
12       Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice)                   PLLC
         Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)                      1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
13       Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045)                         Washington, DC 20005
         GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP                               Telephone: (202) 408-4600
14
         1111 Broadway, Suite 2100                         Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
15       Oakland, California 94607                         ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
         Telephone: (510) 350-9700                         kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
16       Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
         ehg@classlawgroup.com                             Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17       amm@classlawgroup.com
         amz@classlawgroup.com
18
         mht@classlawgroup.com
19       zsw@classlawgroup.com
         hj@classlawgroup.com
20
         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21

22

23                                           ATTESTATION

24          Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document

25   has been obtained from the other signatory.

26
                                                                     /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
27                                                                      Anna Mouw Thompson

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                     -4-                  JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
                                                                   [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                                                                       DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 208    Filed 05/23/23   Page 5 of 5



 1
     PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
 2

 3   DATED: _______________________                      _____________________________
                                                               Hon. Edward M. Chen
 4                                                             United States District Judge

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC             -5-                JOINT SEALING REQUEST AND
                                                         [PROPOSED] ORDER RE COURT ORDER
                                                             DATED MAY 16, 2023 (ECF NO. 206)


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.208.0.pdf
Size
136,225 bytes
SHA-256
db2d7644c66d4772d3bacfb72d8e63a7806a2f171b594f3a4bc38448956fdade
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.208.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top