Court filing
Order. Signed 3/30/2023 by Judge Edward M Chen granting 167… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 188)
Summary
Document 188, filed 03/30/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, carries the heading PROPOSED ORDER RE Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed, submitted by Perkins Coie LLP for Defendant Thomson Reuters. The order text would find that good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal listed portions of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Finance Scholars Group, Inc. (Terry Lloyd) and of Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Andre Mura. Each portion is identified by page and line and by the words before and after the redaction.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order. Signed 3/30/2023 by Judge Edward M Chen granting 167… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 188).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 188. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-03-30-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-188-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-188-0/
, SHA-256 ab38478fb74df147f16ecb76c91e604d5a779512e6217f7873de11a24f4387b4.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 188 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 3
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
7 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 PERKINS COIE LLP
Telephone: 206.359.8000 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Dallas, TX 75201-3347
Telephone: 214.965.7700
9 Attorneys for Defendant Facsimile: 214.965.7799
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
16 Plaintiffs, CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
17 v. SEALED (DKT. 167)
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
19 Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 188 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 3
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Moton to Consider Whether
3 Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed (Dkt. 167) and all supporting materials thereto, and
4 having considered Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Statement in Response and all supporting
5 materials thereto, including the declaration of Kevin Appold (Dkt. 150-3), finds that good cause
6 and compelling reasons exist to seal:
7 The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert
8 Testimony of Finance Scholars Group, Inc. (Terry Lloyd) (Dkt. 167-3) and the following portions
9 of Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Andre Mura in support thereof (Dkt. 167-5):
10
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
11
Dkt. 167-3 Page 2, line 14 (between “there was a” and “between”)
12 Pls. Opp. (2:14)
13 Dkt. 167-3 Page 2, line 17 (between “that if” and “of CLEAR’s”)
Pls. Opp. (2:17)
14
Dkt. 167-3 Page 2, line 18 (between “and” and “were”)
15 Pls. Opp. (2:18)
16 Dkt. 167-3 Page 2, line 22 (between “were” and “then”)
Pls. Opp. (2:22)
17
Dkt. 167-3 Page 8, line 10 (between “about” and “of CLEAR’s”)
18 Pls. Opp. (8:10)
19 Dkt. 167-3 Page 8, line 11 (between “and” and “are”)
Pls. Opp. (8:11)
20
Dkt. 167-3 Page 8, line 13 (between “them” and “to account”)
21 Pls. Opp. (8:13)
22 Dkt. 167-3 Page 8, line 22 (between “to be” and “TR”)
Pls. Opp. (8:22)
23
Dkt. 167-3 Page 8, line 22.5 (between “field” and “percent”)
24 Pls. Opp. (8:22.5)
25 Dkt. 167-5 Page 2, lines 9-11 (after “information requested by Plaintiffs by
Mura Decl. Ex. 2 determining the total number of” and before “and used to help
26 facilitate person searches run through”)
27 Dkt. 167-5 Page 2, line 13 (after “determine the subset of those” and before “a
Mura Decl. Ex. 2 current or past California address.”)
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 188 Filed 03/30/23 Page 3 of 3
1
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
2
Dkt. 167-5 Page 2, line 16 (after “Note that a single natural person may be
3 Mura Decl. Ex. 2 associated with several different” and before “such that”)
4 Dkt. 167-5 Page 2, line 18 (after “The fact that” and before “a current or past
Mura Decl. Ex. 2 California address does not”)
5
Dkt. 167-5 Page 2, line 26 through page 3, line 1 (after “2.” entire sentence)
6 Mura Decl. Ex. 2
7 Dkt. 167-5 Page 3, line 2 (after “The totals include” and before “which relate to
Mura Decl. Ex. 2 persons who are deceased and/or who”)
8
Dkt. 167-5 Page 3, lines 4-5 (after “As of January 9, 2023,” and before “of these
9 Mura Decl. Ex. 2 contained a current or past California address.”)
10 Dkt. 167-5 Page 5, lines 4.5-8.5 (all eight rows of data/information underneath
11 Mura Decl. Ex. 2 the table column headers)
12
13
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16 March 30, 2023
DATED: ____________________ __________________________________
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
17 United States District Judge
18
19 Submitted by:
20 PERKINS COIE LLP
21
22 By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
Anna Mouw Thompson
23
Attorneys for Defendant
24 Thomson Reuters Corporation
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -3- [PROPOSED] ORDER
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.188.0.pdf
- Size
- 147,574 bytes
- SHA-256
- ab38478fb74df147f16ecb76c91e604d5a779512e6217f7873de11a24f4387b4
- Original
- PACER (login required)