Order. Signed 3/28/2023 by Judge Edward M Chen granting 182… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 184)

Summary

Document 184, filed 03/28/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW, is an order permitting Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's objection to reply evidence in the Brooks and Shabazz case against Thomson Reuters Corporation. The word PROPOSED is crossed out in the heading. The order text states that, having considered Plaintiffs' administrative motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs' request to respond to Defendant's objection to reply evidence and accepts Plaintiffs' response as filed. It carries the date March 28, 2023 above the name of Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

            Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC             Document 184    Filed 03/28/23   Page 1 of 2



 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                                NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10                                   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others similarly
13   situated,                                            [PROPOSED]
                                                           XXXXXXXX ORDER PERMITTING
                                                          PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
14                                     Plaintiffs,        DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO REPLY
15                   v.                                   EVIDENCE

16   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
                                                          Hon. Edward M. Chen
17                                   Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


           [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
                             OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
                             CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
            Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC            Document 184        Filed 03/28/23       Page 2 of 2



 1                                          [PROPOSED]
                                             XXXXXXXX ORDER
 2
 3          Having considered Plaintiffs’ administrative motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ request to
 4   respond to Defendant’s objection to reply evidence and accepts Plaintiffs’ response as filed.
 5
 6
 7           March 28, 2023
     Dated: ________________________                        ________________________________
                                                            HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
 8                                                          United States District Judge
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                            1
          [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
                            OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
                            CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.184.0.pdf

Size

89,492 bytes

SHA-256

f7958becadeb4a8c1c5bbd44a37a8087b46ad4ecb9a66152c56c0c2e63ebee52

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.184.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)