Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 182.1)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Permitting Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Objection to Reply Evidence, Document 182-1, filed 03/24/23 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW (N.D. Cal.), for Hon. Edward M. Chen. The proposed text says that, having considered Plaintiffs' administrative motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs' request to respond to Defendant's objection to reply evidence and accepts Plaintiffs' response as filed. The date and signature lines are blank, so it is a proposed order and unsigned.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC              Document 182-1    Filed 03/24/23   Page 1 of 2



 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                                NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10                                   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others similarly
13   situated,                                            [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING
                                                          PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO
14                                     Plaintiffs,        DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO REPLY
15                   v.                                   EVIDENCE

16   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
                                                          Hon. Edward M. Chen
17                                   Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


           [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
                             OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
                             CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC            Document 182-1         Filed 03/24/23       Page 2 of 2



 1                                          [PROPOSED] ORDER
 2
 3          Having considered Plaintiffs’ administrative motion, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ request to
 4   respond to Defendant’s objection to reply evidence and accepts Plaintiffs’ response as filed.
 5
 6
 7   Dated: ________________________                        ________________________________
                                                            HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
 8                                                          United States District Judge
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                            1
          [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
                            OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE
                            CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.182.1.pdf

Size

146,534 bytes

SHA-256

80e286498a651beec763ee0a031d7594fc4a66594fcb08f516a15681756d8897

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.182.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)