Order. Signed 3/21/2023 by Judge Edward M Chen granting 158… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 180)

Summary

An Order Re Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed (Doc. 158), Document 180, filed 03/21/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, N.D. Cal., Judge Hon. Edward M. Chen, three pages. The order states that the Court, having considered the motion and Defendant Thomson Reuters' Statement in Response, including the declaration of Dr. Ran Kivetz, finds that good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal a footnote 5 passage of Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Opinions on Class Certification (Doc. 158-3) and three passages of Kivetz deposition testimony in Exhibit 1 to the Mura declaration (Doc 158-4). It ends "IT IS SO ORDERED," and the date line reads March 21, 2023.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC            Document 180     Filed 03/21/23    Page 1 of 3



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567                Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                       GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                  PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                         3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                       Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                            Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                   Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      PERKINS COIE LLP                                 Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                    HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                           PERKINS COIE LLP
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                          500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                          Dallas, TX 75201-3347
                                                       Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Attorneys for Defendant                          Facsimile: 214.965.7799
      Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11
                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
                             NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
                                       SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
     all others similarly situated,                   [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
                                                      XXXXXXXX
17                                                    ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
                         Plaintiffs,                  CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
18                                                    PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
           v.                                         SEALED (DOC. 158)
19
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,                     Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
20
                         Defendant.
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                                                       [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 180          Filed 03/21/23     Page 2 of 3



 1                                        [PROPOSED]
                                           XXXXXXXX ORDER
 2          The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Moton to Consider Whether

 3   Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed (Doc. 158) and all supporting materials thereto, and

 4   having considered Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Statement in Response and all supporting

 5   materials thereto, including the declaration of Dr. Ran Kivetz, finds that good cause and

 6   compelling reasons exist to seal:

 7          The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s Expert

 8   Opinions on Class Certification (Doc. 158-3) and the following portions of Exhibit 1 to the

 9   Declaration of Andre M. Mura in support thereof (Doc 158-4):

10
                Cite                                     Portion(s) to Seal
11
        Dkt. 158-3             FN 5: After “But while a lucrative practice (generating” and before
12      Pls. Brief (9:27)      “of dollars a year),”
13      Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 27:16-28:5
14      Mura Decl. Ex. 1

15      Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 40:5-23
        Mura Decl. Ex. 1
16
        Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 41:18-20
17      Mura Decl. Ex. 1

18

19

20
     IT IS SO ORDERED.
21

22
              March 21, 2023
      DATED: ____________________                        __________________________________
23                                                       Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
                                                         United States District Judge
24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                         -2-                              [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 180    Filed 03/21/23   Page 3 of 3



 1   Submitted by:

 2   PERKINS COIE LLP
 3

 4   By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
     Anna Mouw Thompson
 5
     Attorneys for Defendant
 6   Thomson Reuters Corporation
 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                   -3-                          [PROPOSED] ORDER


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.180.0.pdf

Size

144,663 bytes

SHA-256

58727bd85e383518630b36f7fd84169d45a26527c805e1b2d8c6240b02e1aeb9

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.180.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)