Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 177.1)
No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 177-1 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 177-1 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
7 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 PERKINS COIE LLP
Telephone: 206.359.8000 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Dallas, TX 75201-3347
Telephone: 214.965.7700
9 Attorneys for Defendant Facsimile: 214.965.7799
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
16 Plaintiffs, UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION RE THOMSON
17 v. REUTERS’ REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF ITS MOTION TO EXCLUDE
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, TESTIMONY OF FINANCE SCHOLARS
GROUP, INC. (DR. TERRY LLOYD)
19 Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 177-1 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 The Court, having considered Thomson Reuters’ Administrative Motion to File Under
3 Seal Confidential Information (“Sealing Motion”), and all supporting materials thereto, including
4 the Declaration of Kevin Appold, in Support of TR’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
5 Confidential information related to its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification,
6 Doc. 150-3 (“Second Sealing Declaration”), the Stipulated Protective Order entered in this action,
7 Doc. 70, and all pleadings and papers on file hereby finds that good cause and compelling reasons
8 exist to seal:
9 The following portions of Thomson Reuters’ Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to
10 Exclude Testimony of Finance Scholars Group, Inc. (Dr. Terry Lloyd):
11
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
12
Reply (6:1-2) Page 6, lines 1-2 (after “For example, TR has paid a flat-rate royalty
13 to the” and before cite to footnote 1)
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
DATED: ____________________ __________________________________
19 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
20
21
Submitted by:
22
PERKINS COIE LLP
23
24
By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
25 Anna Mouw Thompson
26 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.177.1.pdf
- Size
- 125,560 bytes
- SHA-256
- b1ed3a09614c7853a8c6d9fa5e563f349e60f02c2dd9c2130f774e77c3c03f86
- Original
- PACER (login required)