Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 173.1)
Summary
A [Proposed] Order re Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed (Doc. 169), Document 173-1, filed 03/16/23 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC (N.D. Cal.), submitted by Perkins Coie for Thomson Reuters. The proposed text recites that the court considered Plaintiffs' motion and Thomson Reuters' statement, including the Third Sealing Declaration of Kevin Appold, and finds good cause and compelling reasons to seal. A table lists portions of Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of class certification (Doc. 169-3) and of Exhibit 1 to the Mura Declaration (Doc. 169-4), mostly lines of the Gerhard deposition. The date and signature lines for Hon. Edward M. Chen are blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 173.1).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 173-1. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-03-16-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-173-1-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-173-1/
, SHA-256 c228b4f06e96f71a2ddfd61c24a9961fe16f19684da58644487ad2f818c67f55.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 173-1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 4
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
7 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 PERKINS COIE LLP
Telephone: 206.359.8000 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Dallas, TX 75201-3347
Telephone: 214.965.7700
9 Attorneys for Defendant Facsimile: 214.965.7799
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
16 Plaintiffs, CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
17 v. SEALED (DOC. 169)
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
19 Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 173-1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 4
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Moton to Consider Whether
3 Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed (Doc. 169) and all supporting materials thereto, and
4 having considered Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Statement in Response and all supporting
5 materials thereto, including the Third Sealing Declaration of Kevin Appold, finds that good cause
6 and compelling reasons exist to seal:
7 The following portions of the Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class
8 Certification (Doc. 169-3) and the following portions of Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Andre
9 Mura in support thereof (Doc. 169-4):
10
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
11
Doc. 169-3 Page 1, line 12 (after “CLEAR had” and before “—which”)
12 Pls. Reply (1:12)
13 Doc. 169-3 Page 1, line 12 (after “potentially” and before “and”)
14 Pls. Reply (1:12)
15 Doc. 169-3 Page 1, line 13 (beginning of line and before “information that”)
Pls. Reply (1:13)
16
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at at 255:6 (after “Subject is” to end of line 6)
17 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
18 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 255:8-10 (after “The attachment, which is
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 forwarded,” to end of line 10)
19
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 255:13-17 (after “Okay. And it reads,” to end of line
20 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 17)
21 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 257:5-7 (after “So he forwards you this” to end of
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 line 7)
22
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 257:9-10 (after “Do you have an understanding of
23 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 what a” and before “based on this communication from”)
24 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 257:13-16 (after “this is regarding a” to end of line
25 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 16)
26 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 257:18-19 (after “How often does Thomson
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 Reuters” to end of line 19)
27
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 257:24-25 (entire lines)
28 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 173-1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 3 of 4
1
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
2
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 258:2 (after “particular vendor,” to end of line 2)
3 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
4 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 258:14 (beginning of line and before “considered to
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 be proprietary?”)
5
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 258:24 (after “Is data from a” and before
6
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 “proprietary?”)
7
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 261:25 (after “Subject is” and before “is that right?”)
8 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
9 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 262:2-18 (after “And it reads,” to end of line 18)
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
10
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 263:11-12 (after “And it says here,” to end of line
11 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 12)
12 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 263:13-15 (after “What is” to end of line 15)
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
13
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 263:18-22 (after “we did meet with” to end of line
14 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 22)
15 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 263:23-24 (after “The email states that” and before
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 “correct?”)
16
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 263:25–264:1 (after “Yeah. I guess with” to end of
17 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 line 1)
18 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 264:18 (after “The subject is” to end of line 18)
19 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
20 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 264:20 (after “What is” to end of line 20)
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
21
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 264:21-22 (after “That would be a meeting to
22 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 discuss” to end of line 22)
23 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 265:4-7 (entire lines)
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
24
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 265:9-10 (after “And how would” to end of line 10)
25 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
26 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 265:18-22 (after “would be around” to end of line
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 22)
27
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 266:18 (after “The subject is” to end of line 18)
28 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -3- [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 173-1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 4 of 4
1
Cite Portion(s) to Seal
2
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 266:20 (after “So you attended the” and before
3 Mura Decl. Ex. 1 “webinar that's”)
4 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 266:23 (after “attend the” and before “webinar. I --
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 like I don't have a”)
5
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 267:2-10 (after “The email reads,” to end of line 10)
6
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
7
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 267:12 (entire line)
8 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
9 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 267:15-16 (after “And the first key takeaway is,” to
Mura Decl. Ex. 1 end of line 16)
10
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 267:25–268:1 (entire lines)
11 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
12 Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 268:6-8 (entire lines)
Mura Decl. Ex. 1
13
Doc. 169-4 Gerhard Dep. at 269:2-22 (entire lines)
14 Mura Decl. Ex. 1
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19 DATED: ____________________ __________________________________
20 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
21
22
Submitted by:
23
PERKINS COIE LLP
24
25
By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
26 Anna Mouw Thompson
27 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -4- [PROPOSED] ORDER
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.173.1.pdf
- Size
- 134,226 bytes
- SHA-256
- c228b4f06e96f71a2ddfd61c24a9961fe16f19684da58644487ad2f818c67f55
- Original
- PACER (login required)