Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 166.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 166.1)

No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 166-1 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC              Document 166-1    Filed 03/06/23   Page 1 of 2



 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                                NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10                                   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others similarly
13   situated,                                            [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
                                                          DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’
14                                     Plaintiffs,        MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF
15                   v.                                   JOSEPH TUROW

16   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
                                                          Hon. Edward M. Chen
17                                   Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


         [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’ MOTION TO
                        EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
                            CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC             Document 166-1         Filed 03/06/23      Page 2 of 2



 1                                           [PROPOSED] ORDER
 2          On February 6, 2023, Defendant Thomson Reuters filed a motion seeking to exclude the
 3   testimony of Professor Joseph Turow. Having considered Defendant’s motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition, and
 4   all associated briefing, documents, and evidence on the record at the time of this order, the Court finds
 5   that the opinions offered by Professor Turow rest on a reliable foundation and are relevant and helpful at
 6   the class certification stage. See Brown v. Google, LLC, 2022 WL 17961497, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2022).
 7          Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
 8
 9   Dated: ________________________                        ________________________________
                                                            HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
10                                                          United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                            1
         [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’ MOTION TO
                        EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
                            CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.166.1.pdf
Size
170,886 bytes
SHA-256
67ca1dc14c59e6377e58614a60362adf75814dc153549f89261c8e8d4cb3f238
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.166.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top