Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 166.1)
Summary
Document 166-1, filed 03/06/23 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW (Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, N.D. Cal.), is a [PROPOSED] Order Denying Defendant Thomson Reuters' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Joseph Turow, for Hon. Edward M. Chen. It recites that Thomson Reuters filed the motion on February 6, 2023. As drafted, the Court would find that Professor Turow's opinions rest on a reliable foundation and are relevant and helpful at the class certification stage, citing Brown v. Google, LLC, and deny the motion. The date and signature lines are blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 166.1).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 166-1. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-03-06-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-166-1-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-166-1/
, SHA-256 67ca1dc14c59e6377e58614a60362adf75814dc153549f89261c8e8d4cb3f238.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 166-1 Filed 03/06/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
13 situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’
14 Plaintiffs, MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF
15 v. JOSEPH TUROW
16 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
Hon. Edward M. Chen
17 Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’ MOTION TO
EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 166-1 Filed 03/06/23 Page 2 of 2
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 On February 6, 2023, Defendant Thomson Reuters filed a motion seeking to exclude the
3 testimony of Professor Joseph Turow. Having considered Defendant’s motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition, and
4 all associated briefing, documents, and evidence on the record at the time of this order, the Court finds
5 that the opinions offered by Professor Turow rest on a reliable foundation and are relevant and helpful at
6 the class certification stage. See Brown v. Google, LLC, 2022 WL 17961497, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2022).
7 Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
8
9 Dated: ________________________ ________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
10 United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’ MOTION TO
EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.166.1.pdf
- Size
- 170,886 bytes
- SHA-256
- 67ca1dc14c59e6377e58614a60362adf75814dc153549f89261c8e8d4cb3f238
- Original
- PACER (login required)