Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 161.1)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Re Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed (Doc. 158), Document 161-1, filed 02/10/23 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, three pages, before Hon. Edward M. Chen. The proposed order states that the Court has considered the administrative motion and Defendant's statement in response and finds that good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal listed portions. The table lists a footnote of Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Opinions on Class Certification and portions of the Kivetz deposition in Exhibit 1 to the Mura Declaration.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 161-1     Filed 02/10/23    Page 1 of 3



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567            Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                   GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice              PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                     3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                   Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                        Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice               Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      PERKINS COIE LLP                             Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                       PERKINS COIE LLP
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                      500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                      Dallas, TX 75201-3347
                                                   Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Attorneys for Defendant                      Facsimile: 214.965.7799
      Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11
                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
                             NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
                                       SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
     all others similarly situated,              [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’
17                                               ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
                         Plaintiffs,             CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
18                                               PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
           v.                                    SEALED (DOC. 158)
19
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,                Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
20
                         Defendant.
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                                                   [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 161-1         Filed 02/10/23     Page 2 of 3



 1                                        [PROPOSED] ORDER

 2          The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Moton to Consider Whether

 3   Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed (Doc. 158) and all supporting materials thereto, and

 4   having considered Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Statement in Response and all supporting

 5   materials thereto, including the declaration of Dr. Ran Kivetz, finds that good cause and

 6   compelling reasons exist to seal:

 7          The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s Expert

 8   Opinions on Class Certification (Doc. 158-3) and the following portions of Exhibit 1 to the

 9   Declaration of Andre M. Mura in support thereof (Doc 158-4):

10
                Cite                                     Portion(s) to Seal
11
        Dkt. 158-3             FN 5: After “But while a lucrative practice (generating” and before
12      Pls. Brief (9:27)      “of dollars a year),”
13      Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 27:16-28:5
14      Mura Decl. Ex. 1

15      Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 40:5-23
        Mura Decl. Ex. 1
16
        Dkt. 158-4             Kivetz Dep. at 41:18-20
17      Mura Decl. Ex. 1

18

19

20
     IT IS SO ORDERED.
21

22
      DATED: ____________________                        __________________________________
23                                                       Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
                                                         United States District Judge
24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                         -2-                              [PROPOSED] ORDER
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 161-1   Filed 02/10/23   Page 3 of 3



 1   Submitted by:

 2   PERKINS COIE LLP
 3

 4   By: /s/ Anna Mouw Thompson
     Anna Mouw Thompson
 5
     Attorneys for Defendant
 6   Thomson Reuters Corporation
 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                    -3-                         [PROPOSED] ORDER


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.161.1.pdf

Size

126,556 bytes

SHA-256

b5d956943898837956a9bc3279104e124af9033cce3065280d70c5f4a8737523

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.161.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)