Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 159.2)
No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 159-2 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 159-2 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
13 individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
14 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
Plaintiffs, EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS
15
v. CERTIFICATION
16
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
17 Hon. Edward M. Chen
18 Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 159-2 Filed 02/06/23 Page 2 of 2
1 Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s Expert Opinions on Class
2 Certification, relating to Thomson Reuters’ class certification rebuttal experts Dr. Ran Kivetz
3 and Professor Jane Bambauer, came for hearing before this Court on the above-captioned
4 matter. Having fully considered the papers, the arguments of counsel, and good cause
5 appearing therefor:
6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s
7 Expert Opinions on Class Certification is GRANTED in full. Defendant’s proposed experts,
8 Ran Kivetz and Jane Bambauer, offer opinions that are not admissible under Federal Rules
9 of Evidence 702 and 703.
10 SO ORDERED.
11
12 Dated: ________________________ ________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
13
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS CERTIFICATION
CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.159.2.pdf
- Size
- 137,699 bytes
- SHA-256
- 811043a826b0c12eb1c5b29aa91cc29452edd26a3c7a4ce3c63942b60a35ba4b
- Original
- PACER (login required)