Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 159.2)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions on Class Certification, Document 159-2, filed 02/06/23 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, two pages. It recites Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Opinions on Class Certification, relating to Thomson Reuters' class certification rebuttal experts Dr. Ran Kivetz and Professor Jane Bambauer. The proposed order would grant the motion in full and state that the experts offer opinions that are not admissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 703. The date line is blank above the name of Honorable Edward M. Chen.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

         Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 159-2   Filed 02/06/23   Page 1 of 2




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                          NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10                            SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,            Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
13   individually and on behalf of all others
     similarly situated,                        [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
14                                              PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
                               Plaintiffs,      EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS
15
                 v.                             CERTIFICATION
16
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
17                                              Hon. Edward M. Chen

18                          Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

            [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
                     EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS CERTIFICATION
                          CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 159-2       Filed 02/06/23    Page 2 of 2




 1          Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s Expert Opinions on Class
 2   Certification, relating to Thomson Reuters’ class certification rebuttal experts Dr. Ran Kivetz
 3   and Professor Jane Bambauer, came for hearing before this Court on the above-captioned
 4   matter. Having fully considered the papers, the arguments of counsel, and good cause
 5   appearing therefor:
 6          IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s
 7   Expert Opinions on Class Certification is GRANTED in full. Defendant’s proposed experts,
 8   Ran Kivetz and Jane Bambauer, offer opinions that are not admissible under Federal Rules
 9   of Evidence 702 and 703.
10          SO ORDERED.
11
12   Dated: ________________________                  ________________________________
                                                      HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
13
                                                      United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                           1
             [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE
                      EXPERT OPINIONS ON CLASS CERTIFICATION
                           CASE NO. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.159.2.pdf

Size

137,699 bytes

SHA-256

811043a826b0c12eb1c5b29aa91cc29452edd26a3c7a4ce3c63942b60a35ba4b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.159.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)