Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 158.2)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order re: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed, Document 158-2, filed 02/06/23 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW (N.D. Cal.). It relates to Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant's Expert Opinions on Class Certification and would allow listed portions to be filed under seal. The table names Defendant as the designating party for each item, including portions of the Kivetz deposition (Ex. 1 to the Mura Declaration) and specific lines and pages of Plaintiffs' Motion. The order ends with a blank date line for Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge, and is unsigned.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

         Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 158-2   Filed 02/06/23   Page 1 of 3




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
10                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                              SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,            Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others
13
     similarly situated,                        [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’
14                                              ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
                               Plaintiffs,      CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
15                                              PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
           v.
16                                              SEALED
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
17                                              Hon. Edward M. Chen
18                           Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 158-2      Filed 02/06/23   Page 2 of 3




 1         Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another
 2   Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed, relating to Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude
 3   Defendant’s Expert Opinions on Class Certification (“Motion”) and materials in support of
 4   that Motion, and any responses from the designating party, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5;
 5         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
 6         The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendant’s Expert
 7   Opinions on Class Certification and supporting documents may be filed under seal:
 8        Exhibit to Andre M. Mura Declaration in           Designating Ruling
           Support of Motion or Portion of Motion               Party
 9
      Ex. 1 (Kivetz Dep.), 26:19-27:2                      Defendant
10    Ex. 1 (Kivetz Dep.), 27:16-28:5                      Defendant
      Ex. 1 (Kivetz Dep.), 40:5-40:23                      Defendant
11
      Ex. 1 (Kivetz Dep.), 41:18-41:20                     Defendant
12    Pls.’ Motion, page 9, line 27 (between               Defendant
      “generating” and “of”)
13
      Pls.’ Motion, page 3, lines 9-10 (between “here”     Defendant
14    and end of sentence)
      Pls.’ Motion, page 3, lines 11-12 (between           Defendant
15
      “harms” and end of sentence)
16    Pls.’ Motion, page 3, lines 12-14 (between “that”    Defendant
      and end of sentence)
17
      Pls.’ Motion, page 3, lines 14-15 (between           Defendant
18    “fourth,” and end of sentence)
      Pls.’ Motion, page 4, lines 1-2 (between “that”      Defendant
19
      and end of sentence)
20    Pls.’ Motion, page 4, lines 4-5 (from start of line  Defendant
      to end of sentence)
21
      Pls.’ Motion, page 4, line 5 (between “of” and       Defendant
22    “is”)
      Pls.’ Motion, page 4, lines 21-22 (between “case”    Defendant
23
      and end of sentence)
24    Pls.’ Motion, page 5, line 8 (between “Kivetz’s”     Defendant
      and end of line)
25
      Page 7, line 16 (between “consumers’” and            Defendant
26    “when Californians”)
      Page 8, line 19 (from beginning of line to “with     Defendant
27
      the implication”)
28    Page 8, lines 25-26 (between “marketplace,” to       Defendant
      “ECF No. 151-14”)                               1
       [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
                WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                                   Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
         Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 158-2       Filed 02/06/23   Page 3 of 3




 1   Page 8, line 27 (from beginning of line to end of    Defendant
     sentence)
 2
     Page 9, lines 4-6 (from “speculate that” to end of   Defendant
 3   sentence)
     Page 10, line 11 (between “survey by” and “—         Defendant
 4
     without”)
 5   Page 10, lines 14-15 (between “questions such as”    Defendant
     and “without offering”)
 6
     Page 10, lines 22.5-23.5 (from “arguing that         Defendant
 7   because” to end of sentence)
     Page 11, lines 12-13 (between “Turow” to “and        Defendant
 8
     that”)
 9   Page 11, line 13 (between “position is” and          Defendant
     “and”)
10
     Page 11, line 13 (from “and” to end of sentence)     Defendant
11   Page 14, lines 4-6 (quotation in parenthetical)      Defendant
12
13   IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15   DATED: ______________________                 ___________________________
                                                   EDWARD M. CHEN
16
                                                   United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                           2
      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.158.2.pdf

Size

163,013 bytes

SHA-256

c281f9e7e93680d54c63834b12f26c49b485fe5bf61ffa0609b7886a480b124e

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.158.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)