Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. Administrative Motion to File Under Seal PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE… — Brooks v. Thomson…

Court filing

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 158)

Summary

In Document 158, filed 02/06/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW before Hon. Edward M. Chen, Plaintiffs file an administrative motion to consider whether another party's materials should be sealed. They say Defendant designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only an exhibit to Andre M. Mura's declaration supporting Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions on Class Certification, the Kivetz Deposition, and list the provisionally sealed portions. They also list portions of their Motion to Exclude that quote from that exhibit or from expert reports submitted under seal by Defendant. For each item the table says Defendant is to provide evidence per the sealing rule.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Administrative Motion to File Under Seal PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 158).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 158. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-02-06-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-158-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-158-0/, SHA-256 809cf9db7d28b67f0fe5090a11876adfcb7f42a8d33d3c813809055d40ec53ae.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

           Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 158     Filed 02/06/23   Page 1 of 4




 1    Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)                        Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
      Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)                        Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
 2
      Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)                         COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
 3    Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice)                   PLLC
      Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)                      1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
 4                                                      Washington, DC 20005
      Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045)
 5    GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP                               Telephone: (202) 408-4600
      1111 Broadway, Suite 2100                         Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
 6    Oakland, CA 94607                                 ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
 7    Telephone: (510) 350-9700                         kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
      Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
 8    ehg@classlawgroup.com
 9    amm@classlawgroup.com
      amz@classlawgroup.com
10    mht@classlawgroup.com
11    zsw@classlawgroup.com
      hj@classlawgroup.com
12
13   Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

14
15
                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
16                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17                               SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,                   Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others
19
     similarly situated,                               PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
20                                                     MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
                                   Plaintiffs,         ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS
21
            v.                                         SHOULD BE SEALED
22
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,                      Hon. Edward M. Chen
23
24                               Defendant.
25
26
27
28

        PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
                       PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
           Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 158        Filed 02/06/23    Page 2 of 4




 1         Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) and the Stipulated Protective Order entered by
 2   the Court on December 17, 2021 (ECF No. 70), Plaintiffs request that the Court consider
 3   whether material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
 4   ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” should be filed under seal. Specifically, Defendant has
 5   designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
 6   ONLY” the following exhibits to Andre M. Mura’s Declaration in Support of Plaintiffs’
 7   Omnibus Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions on Class Certification:
 8     Exhibit to           Document                      Provisionally      Evidence Offered in
         Mura                                                 Sealed          Support of Sealing
 9
      Declaration                                           Portion(s)
10       Ex. 1    Kivetz Deposition                      26:19-27:2;      Def. to provide
                                                         27:16-28:5;      evidence per Local Rule
11
                                                         40:5-40:23;      79-5(f)
12                                                       41:18-41:20
13
           The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude quote from or otherwise refer
14
     to the above exhibits and so may also be potentially considered confidential by Defendant:
15
        Provisionally Sealed Portion of Motion      Evidence Offered in Support of Sealing
16
      Page 9, line 27 (between “generating” and     Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
17
      “of”)
18
19         The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude quote from or otherwise refer
20   to expert reports that were submitted under seal by Defendant and so may also be
21   potentially considered confidential by Defendant:
22      Provisionally Sealed Portion of Motion      Evidence Offered in Support of Sealing
23    Page 3, lines 9-10 (between “here” and end    Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
      of sentence)
24
      Page 3, lines 11-12 (between “harms” and      Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
25    end of sentence)
26    Page 3, lines 12-14 (between “that” and end   Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
      of sentence)
27    Page 3, lines 14-15 (between “fourth,” and    Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
      end of sentence)
28
                                            1
        PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
                       PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 158        Filed 02/06/23    Page 3 of 4




 1   Page 4, lines 1-2 (between “that” and end         Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     of sentence)
 2
     Page 4, lines 4-5 (from start of line to end of   Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
 3   sentence)
     Page 4, line 5 (between “of” and “is”)            Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
 4
     Page 4, lines 21-22 (between “case” and end       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
 5   of sentence)
     Page 5, line 8 (between “Kivetz’s” and end        Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
 6
     of line)
 7   Page 6, line 13 (between “mischaracterizes        Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     as a” and “only”)
 8
     Page 6, line 13 (between “necessitates” and       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
 9   end of sentence)
     Page 6, lines 14-16 (between “show that” to       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
10
     end of sentence)
11   Page 6, lines 18-20 (between “why” to “or         Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     know”)
12
     Page 7, line 16 (between “consumers’” and         Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
13   “when Californians”)
     Page 8, line 19 (from beginning of line to        Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
14
     “with the implication”)
15   Page 8, lines 25-26 (between “marketplace,”       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     to “ECF No. 151-14”)
16
     Page 8, line 27 (from beginning of line to        Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
17   end of sentence)
     Page 9, lines 4-6 (from “speculate that” to       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
18
     end of sentence)
19   Page 10, line 11 (between “survey by” and         Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     “—without”)
20
     Page 10, lines 14-15 (between “questions          Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
21   such as” and “without offering”)
     Page 10, lines 22.5-23.5 (from “arguing that      Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
22
     because” to end of sentence)
23   Page 11, lines 12-13 (between “Turow” to          Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     “and that”)
24
     Page 11, line 13 (between “position is” and       Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
25   “and”)
     Page 11, line 13 (from “and” to end of            Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
26
     sentence)
27   Page 14, lines 4-6 (quotation in                  Def. to provide evidence per L.R. 79-5(f)
     parenthetical)
28
                                           2
       PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
                      PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
           Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 158       Filed 02/06/23    Page 4 of 4




 1          Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f)(3), Defendant, as the Designating Party, bears the
 2   responsibility to establish that its designated materials are sealable. Plaintiffs provisionally
 3   file these documents under seal to give Defendant an opportunity to specify any reasons
 4   for keeping the documents under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(c).
 5
            DATED: February 6, 2023                    Respectfully submitted,
 6
                                                       /s/ Andre M. Mura
 7
                                                       Andre M. Mura
 8
                                                       Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
 9
                                                       Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
10                                                     Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)
                                                       Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice)
11                                                     Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)
12                                                     Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045)
                                                       GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
13                                                     1111 Broadway, Suite 2100
14                                                     Oakland, California 94607
                                                       Telephone: (510) 350-9700
15                                                     Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
16                                                     ehg@classlawgroup.com
                                                       amm@classlawgroup.com
17                                                     amz@classlawgroup.com
18                                                     mht@classlawgroup.com
                                                       zsw@classlawgroup.com
19                                                     hj@classlawgroup.com
20
                                                       Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
21                                                     Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
                                                       COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
22
                                                       PLLC
23                                                     1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
                                                       Washington, DC 20005
24
                                                       Telephone: (202) 408-4600
25                                                     Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
                                                       ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
26                                                     vnugent@cohenmilstein.com
27                                                     kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com

28                                            Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
                                            3
        PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
                       PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.158.0.pdf
Size
171,677 bytes
SHA-256
809cf9db7d28b67f0fe5090a11876adfcb7f42a8d33d3c813809055d40ec53ae
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.158.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top