Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 157.5)
Summary
Document 157-5, filed 02/06/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, is a proposed order submitted by Perkins Coie LLP for Defendant Thomson Reuters that would grant its Motion to Exclude Testimony of Joseph Turow. The proposed order would state that Plaintiffs' expert's opinion fails to meet the criteria of the Federal Rules of Evidence and that his testimony constitutes mere personal opinion not supported by scientifically valid principles. It would exclude his testimony and report to date. The date line and the signature line for Hon. Edward M. Chen are blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 157.5).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 157-5. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-02-06-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-157-5-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-157-5/
, SHA-256 3870c4d160f5a545087dd2116e2c720c525edb619421f1938cf34383117b1445.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 157-5 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 2
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
7 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 PERKINS COIE LLP
Telephone: 206.359.8000 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Dallas, TX 75201-3347
Telephone: 214.965.7700
9 Attorneys for Defendant Facsimile: 214.965.7799
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
16 Plaintiffs, TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
17 v.
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
19 Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEF.’S
MOTION TO EXCLUDE PROF. TUROW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 157-5 Filed 02/06/23 Page 2 of 2
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 Defendant Thomson Reuters has filed a Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs’
3 Expert, Joseph Turow (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs oppose that Motion. Having considered the
4 Motion, Plaintiffs’ Opposition, and all associated briefing, documents, and evidence on the record
5 at the time of this Order, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the
6 opinion offered by Professor Joseph Turow fails to meet the criteria of Federal Rule of Evidence
7 702. Prof. Turow’s testimony constitutes mere personal opinion and is not supported by
8 scientifically valid principles. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1319 (9th
9 Cir. 1995). His testimony and report to date are therefore excluded.
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 DATED: ____________________ __________________________________
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
13 United States District Judge
14
15 Submitted by:
16 PERKINS COIE LLP
17
18 By: /s/ Hayden M. Schottlaender
Hayden M. Schottlaender
19
Attorneys for Defendant
20 Thomson Reuters Corporation
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEF.’S
MOTION TO EXCLUDE PROF. TUROW
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.157.5.pdf
- Size
- 123,617 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3870c4d160f5a545087dd2116e2c720c525edb619421f1938cf34383117b1445
- Original
- PACER (login required)