Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 157.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 157.1)

No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 157-1 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 157-1     Filed 02/06/23    Page 1 of 3



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567            Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                   GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice              PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                     3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                   Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                        Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice               Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      PERKINS COIE LLP                             Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                       PERKINS COIE LLP
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                      500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                      Dallas, TX 75201-3347
                                                   Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Attorneys for Defendant                      Facsimile: 214.965.7799
      Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11
                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
                             NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
                                       SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
     all others similarly situated,              [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
17                                               ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
                         Plaintiffs,             UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL
18                                               INFORMATION REGARDING
           v.                                    DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’
19                                               MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,                FINANCE SCHOLARS GROUP, INC.
20
                                                 (DR. TERRY LLOYD)
                         Defendant.              (CIV. L.R. 7-11 AND 79-5)
21

22                                               Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                             [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
                                                             FILE UNDER SEAL INFORMATION RE
                                                        MOTION TO EXCLUDE LLOYD TESTIMONY
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 157-1        Filed 02/06/23      Page 2 of 3



 1                                        [PROPOSED] ORDER

 2          The Court, having considered Defendant Thomson Reuters’ Administrative Motion to File

 3   Under Seal Confidential Information Regarding its Motion to Exclude Testimony of Finance

 4   Scholars Group, Inc. (Dr. Terry Lloyd) (“Sealing Motion”); the Omnibus Declaration of Hayden

 5   M. Schottlaender in Support of TR’s (1) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert

 6   Professor Joseph Turow and (2) Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Finance

 7   Scholars Group, Inc. (Dr. Terry Lloyd) (“Schottlaender Declaration”); the previously filed

 8   Declaration of Kevin Appold in Support of TR’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal

 9   Confidential Information related to its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification

10   (“Appold Sealing Declaration”) (Doc. 150-3); the Stipulated Protective Order entered in this

11   action (Doc. 70); and all pleadings and papers on file, hereby finds that good cause and

12   compelling reasons exist to seal:

13          As identified in Table 1 to the Sealing Motion, the following portions of Thomson

14   Reuters’ Motion to Exclude Testimony of Finance Scholars Group, Inc. (Dr. Terry Lloyd) and the

15   following portions of Exhibit 1 to the Schottlaender Declaration.

16
             Cite                                     Portion(s) to Seal
17
      Motion                 After “Over the period Dr. Lloyd analyzed, recurring revenue made
18    (2:7)                  up more than” and before “of TR’s revenue”
      Motion                 After “from CLEAR, while transactional revenue accounted for just
19    (2:8)                  under” and before “See id. at 3.”
20    Motion                 Table excerpted from FSG / Dr. Lloyd Expert Report, first row titled:
      (3:2)                  “Revenues” (all data/information contained under columns 2017-
21                           2021)
      Motion                 Table excerpted from FSG / Dr. Lloyd Expert Report, third row
22    (3:4)                  titled: “CLEAR US Revenues” (all data/information contained under
                             columns 2017-2021)
23
      Motion                 Table excerpted from FSG / Dr. Lloyd Expert Report, fifth row titled:
24    (3:7)                  “CLEAR California Revenues” (all data/information contained under
                             columns 2017-2021)
25    Motion                 Table excerpted from FSG / Dr. Lloyd Expert Report, sixth row
      (3:8)                  titled: “California Natural Persons” (all data/information contained
26                           under columns 2017-2021)
27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                          -2-      [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
                                                                   FILE UNDER SEAL INFORMATION RE
                                                              MOTION TO EXCLUDE LLOYD TESTIMONY
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 157-1        Filed 02/06/23     Page 3 of 3



 1          Cite                                      Portion(s) to Seal
 2
      Motion                 Table excerpted from FSG / Dr. Lloyd Expert Report, seventh row
 3    (3:10)                 titled: “CLEAR California Revenues / Persons” (all data/information
                             contained under columns 2017-2021)
 4    Motion                 After “Dr. Lloyd therefore concluded that plaintiffs are entitled to”
      (5:7)                  and before “of his calculated revenue”
 5    Motion                 After “TR realizes a” and before “profit margin from operating
      (10:17)                CLEAR.”
 6
      Schottlaender          Lloyd Dep. at 61:18 (beginning of line and before “million.”)
 7    Decl. Ex. 1

 8

 9   IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

11    DATED: ____________________                         __________________________________
                                                          Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
12                                                        United States District Judge

13

14   Submitted by:

15   PERKINS COIE LLP

16

17   By: /s/ Hayden M. Schottlaender
     Hayden M. Schottlaender
18
     Attorneys for Defendant
19   Thomson Reuters Corporation

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                          -3-      [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
                                                                   FILE UNDER SEAL INFORMATION RE
                                                              MOTION TO EXCLUDE LLOYD TESTIMONY


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.157.1.pdf
Size
130,626 bytes
SHA-256
f3c8d231ceb25a405869af5a731d5401c71090c0aeefdc19f61d28ab0a35048b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.157.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top