Court filing
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 141)
Summary
A stipulation with a proposed order, Document 141, filed 11/22/22 in Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW (N.D. Cal.), regarding Plaintiffs' amended complaint and Defendant's deadline to respond. It recites that Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint on November 14, 2022 that included certain previously dismissed claims, which they say they kept to preserve appellate rights. The parties ask that the earlier dismissal be clarified as with prejudice, that Plaintiffs refile the complaint without those claims, and that Thomson Reuters respond by December 28, 2022. Counsel for both sides signed on November 22, 2022, and the order line for Hon. Edward M. Chen is blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS AMENDED… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 141).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 141. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-11-22-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-141-0-doc-141/
, SHA-256 5784c8bb97369490bb19630dbd49d44cd58cb757c0f7dba20bb22c663c5a52e4.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 1 of 6
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658) Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
1
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541) Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
2 Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100) COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice) PLLC
3 Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490) 1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045) Washington, DC 20005
4
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP Telephone: (202) 408-4600
5 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
Oakland, CA 94607 ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
6 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
7 Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
ehg@classlawgroup.com
8 amm@classlawgroup.com
amz@classlawgroup.com
9
mht@classlawgroup.com
10 zsw@classlawgroup.com
hj@classlawgroup.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
individually and on behalf of all others
19
similarly situated, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
20 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs, AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
21 v. DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO
RESPOND THERETO
22
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
23 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
1
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 2 of 6
1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), and Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and 7-
2 12, the parties hereby stipulate as follows:
3 Whereas, on November 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed, with leave of Court, a first amended
4 complaint that included certain claims previously dismissed, see ECF 54, 133, 135;
5 Whereas, Plaintiffs included such claims in an abundance of caution to preserve
6 appellate rights because, while they had understood such claims to have been dismissed with
7 prejudice, the Court’s order did not expressly so state, see ECF 123 at 2 n.1;
8 Whereas, the parties have met and conferred and agree that, with the Court’s
9 clarification that the previously dismissed claims were dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiffs may
10 refile their amended complaint without re-alleging previously dismissed claims, thus obviating
11 any need of Defendant to file another motion to dismiss such claims;
12 Whereas, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and 7-12, the parties also agree that
13 Defendant may file a responsive pleading by December 28, 2022;
14 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s
15 approval, that:
16 1. The Court clarifies that in its previous order granting in part and denying in part
17 Defendant’s motion to dismiss was with prejudice and those claims and issues are
18 preserved for appeal, see ECF 54; see Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir.
19 2012);
20 2. Plaintiffs shall refile their first amended complaint without the dismissed claims within
21 five (5) court days of entry of this order;
22 3. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading no later than December 28, 2022.
23
24
25
26
27
28 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 3 of 6
1
DATED: November 22, 2022 GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
2
3 Respectfully submitted,
4
/s/ Andre M. Mura
5
6
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
7 Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)
8 Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice)
9 Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)
Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045)
10 GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
1111 Broadway, Suite 2100
11 Oakland, California 94607
12 (510) 350-9700
ehg@classlawgroup.com
13 amm@classlawgroup.com
amz@classlawgroup.com
14
mht@classlawgroup.com
15 zsw@classlawgroup.com
hj@classlawgroup.com
16
17 Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
18 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
19
Washington, DC 20005
20 Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
21 ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
22 kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
23
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
24
25
26
27
28 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 4 of 6
1 DATED: November 22, 2022 PERKINS COIE LLP
2
By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
3
4 Susan D. Fahringer (SBN 21567)
Nicola C. Menaldo (pro hac vice)
5 Anna M. Thompson (pro hac vice)
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
6
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
7 Telephone: (206) 359-8000
Facsimile: (206) 359-9000
8 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
9 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
10
Hayden M. Schottlaender (pro hac vice)
11
PERKINS COIE LLP
12 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
Dallas, Texas 75201-3347
13 Telephone: (214) 965-7700
Facsimile: (214) 965-7799
14
HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
15
Gabriella Gallego (SBN 324226)
16 PERKINS COIE LLP
17 3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
18 Telephone: (650) 838-4300
Facsimile: (650) 838-4350
19
GGallego@perkinscoie.com
20
Attorneys for Defendant
21 Thomson Reuters Corporation
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 5 of 6
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4 DATED: ___________________ __________________________
The Hon. Edward M. Chen
5 United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 141 Filed 11/22/22 Page 6 of 6
1 ATTESTATION
2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
3 document has been obtained from the other signatory.
4
5 /s/ Andre M. Mura
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND THERETO
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.141.0.pdf
- Size
- 102,390 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5784c8bb97369490bb19630dbd49d44cd58cb757c0f7dba20bb22c663c5a52e4
- Original
- PACER (login required)