Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. ORDER re 137 STIPULATION Stipulation EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO… — Brooks v. Thoms…

Court filing

ORDER re 137 STIPULATION Stipulation EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 139)

Summary

Document 139, stamped Filed 11/15/22 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, is a stipulation and proposed order extending deadlines on Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed, filed November 9, 2022. The parties agree to extend Thomson Reuters' deadline to submit a statement or declaration by 21 days, to December 7, 2022, and Plaintiffs' response by 5 days, to December 16, 2022. They cite the volume and density of the materials and the need for a thorough review of what should be sealed, and say no other deadlines will be affected. The stipulation is dated November 14, 2022 and signed by Susan D. Fahringer and Andre M. Mura, and the closing order line for Hon. Edward M. Chen is dated November 15 with a blank signature line.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“ORDER re 137 STIPULATION Stipulation EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 139).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 139. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-11-16-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-139-0-doc-139/, SHA-256 c3d72c81a5e1ce3552ed50dcb0a46de6c2535144412ad6f0a7b5f2f4547bc928.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

       Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 139 Filed 11/15/22 Page 1 of 3



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567                  Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                         GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                    PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                           3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                         Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                              Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                     Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      PERKINS COIE LLP                                   Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                      HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                             PERKINS COIE LLP
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                            500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                            Dallas, TX 75201-3347
      Attorneys for Defendant                            Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Thomson Reuters Corporation                        Facsimile: 214.965.7799
10
                                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
                              NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
                                         SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13

14
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
15   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
     all others similarly situated,                   STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
16                                                    ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
                           Plaintiffs,                PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5
17
            v.                                        Current Response Date: November 16, 2022
18
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,                     New Response Date:       December 7, 2022
19
                           Defendant.
20

21

22

23          Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-
24   12, Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and
25   Rasheed Shabazz (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as
26   follows:
27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                                 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                                EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO
                                                                                  LOCAL RULE 79-5
       Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 139 Filed 11/15/22 Page 2 of 3



 1          WHEREAS, N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 79-5 governs the under seal filing of documents

 2   designated as confidential or subject to a protective order;

 3          WHEREAS, on November 9, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Motion to Consider

 4   Whether Another Party’s Materials [namely, Thomson Reuters’ materials] Should Be Sealed (the

 5   “Sealing Motion”), Dkt. 124.

 6          WHEREAS, N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) requires Thomson Reuters, the

 7   designating party of the materials subject to the Sealing Motion, to file a statement and/or

 8   declaration establishing that the designated material is sealable within 7 days of the filing of an

 9   administrative motion to file under seal;

10          WHEREAS, N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) requires Plaintiffs to file a response to

11   Thomson Reuters’ statement and/or declaration no later than 4 days after the filing of that

12   statement and/or declaration;

13          WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree to extend Thomson Reuters’ deadline for filing its

14   statement and/or declaration by 21 days and Plaintiffs’ deadline for filing their response to

15   Thomson Reuters’ statement and/or declaration by 5 days;

16          WHEREAS, there is good cause for an extension given the volume and density of the

17   materials subject to the Sealing Motion and the need for Thomson Reuters to conduct a thorough

18   and careful review to determine which of those materials should, in fact, be sealed;

19          WHEREAS, no party will be prejudiced and no other deadlines will be affected by the

20   extension.

21          IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties as follows:

22          1.      Subject to the Court’s approval, Thomson Reuters’ deadline to submit a statement

23   and/or declaration in response to Plaintiffs’ Sealing Motion pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 is

24   extended by 21 days, to December 7, 2022, and Plaintiffs’ deadline to submit a response to

25   Thomson Reuters’ statement and/or declaration is extended by 5 days, to December 16, 2022.

26          IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

27

28   Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                                     STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                      -2-
                                                                    EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO
                                                                                      LOCAL RULE 79-5
      Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 139 Filed 11/15/22 Page 3 of 3



 1
     DATED: November 14, 2022                          PERKINS COIE LLP
 2

 3                                                    By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
                                                          Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
 4                                                        SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
 5                                                     Attorneys for Defendant
                                                       Thomson Reuters Corporation
 6
     DATED: November 14, 2022                         By: /s/ Andre M. Mura
 7
                                                          Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
 8                                                        amm@classlawgroup.com

 9       Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)                        Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
         Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)                        Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
10       Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)                         COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
         Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice)                   PLLC
11       Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)                      1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
12       Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045)                         Washington, DC 20005
         GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP                               Telephone: (202) 408-4600
13       1111 Broadway, Suite 2100                         Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
         Oakland, California 94607                         ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
14       Telephone: (510) 350-9700                         kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
         Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
15
         ehg@classlawgroup.com                             Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16       amm@classlawgroup.com
         amz@classlawgroup.com
17       mht@classlawgroup.com
         zsw@classlawgroup.com
18       hj@classlawgroup.com
19

20                                           ATTESTATION

21          Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document

22   has been obtained from the other signatory.

23
                                                                     /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
24                                                                      Susan D. Fahringer
25   PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26   DATED: November 15,
           _______________________
                         2022                                      _____________________________
                                                                         Hon. Edward M. Chen
27                                                                       United States District Judge
28   Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                                   STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                     -3-
                                                                  EXTENDING DEADLINES PURSUANT TO
                                                                                    LOCAL RULE 79-5


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.139.0.pdf
Size
178,655 bytes
SHA-256
c3d72c81a5e1ce3552ed50dcb0a46de6c2535144412ad6f0a7b5f2f4547bc928
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.139.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top