Proposed Order Denying Plaintiffs' Rule 16(B)(4) Motion to Modify… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 114.4)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Denying Plaintiffs' Rule 16(B)(4) Motion to Modify Case Schedule, Document 114-4, filed 10/11/22 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, two pages, before Hon. Edward M. Chen. The proposed order recites the motion (ECF No. 113) and Thomson Reuters's opposition and would deny the motion. It would direct the parties to meet and confer on a briefing schedule for any Daubert motions in connection with Plaintiffs' anticipated Motion for Class Certification and to jointly propose a stipulated schedule, or their respective positions, by November 3, 2022. The date line is blank above the name of Honorable Edward M. Chen.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 114-4     Filed 10/11/22    Page 1 of 2



 1   Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567                  Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
     SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                         GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2   Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                    PERKINS COIE LLP
 3   NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                           3150 Porter Drive
     Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                         Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4   EEarl@perkinscoie.com                              Telephone: 650.838.4300
     Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                     Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5   AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
     PERKINS COIE LLP                                   Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6
     1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                      HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7   Seattle, WA 98101-3099                             PERKINS COIE LLP
     Telephone: 206.359.8000                            500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8   Facsimile: 206.359.9000                            Dallas, TX 75201-3347
     Attorneys for Defendant                            Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9   Thomson Reuters Corporation                        Facsimile: 214.965.7799
10

11
                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
                               NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
                                    SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,               Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16
     individually and on behalf of all others
17   similarly situated,                           [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
                                                   PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 16(B)(4) MOTION TO
18                Plaintiff,                       MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE

19         v.                                      Hon. Edward M. Chen
20   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
21                Defendants.
22

23

24

25

26

27

28       NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                            [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
                                                      PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 16(B)(4) MOTION
                                                           TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC          Document 114-4         Filed 10/11/22      Page 2 of 2



 1          Having considered Plaintiffs’ motion to modify the case schedule pursuant to Civil Local
 2   Rule 6-3 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), ECF No. 113 (the “Motion”), Defendant
 3   Thomson Reuters Corporation’s opposition to the Motion, and the record in this case, the Court
 4   hereby DENIES the Motion.
 5          The parties shall meet and confer regarding a briefing schedule for any Daubert motions
 6   to be filed in connection with Plaintiffs’ anticipated Motion for Class Certification, and jointly
 7   propose a stipulated schedule, or the parties’ respective positions, by November 3, 2022.
 8

 9          IT IS SO ORDERED.
10

11
     Date                                              Honorable Edward M. Chen
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
      NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC                      -1-                        [PROPOSED] ORDER
                                                                      DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE
                                                                                16(B)(4) MOTION
                                                                                                 158588196.3


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.114.4.pdf

Size

109,006 bytes

SHA-256

710724e97c1556a55cacff73617603be5b729880ef1fc867aefee62bf817a289

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.114.4.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)